western australia: was populated

Related concepts

Parents	australia Weight: 0.65 , state Weight: 0.62 , country Weight: 0.60 , region Weight: 0.60 , place Weight: 0.60
Siblings	central african republic Weight: 0.36 , west germany Weight: 0.36 , central american country Weight: 0.36 , east asia Weight: 0.35 , sydney Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property	Similarity
was populated	1.00
is populated	0.98
is sparsely populated	0.87

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.64

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.98

Evidence: 0.48

Plausible(australia, is populated) ⋁

Evidence: 0.03

¬ Typical(western australia, was populated)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.98

Evidence: 0.19

Plausible(region, is populated) ⋁

Evidence: 0.03

¬ Typical(western australia, was populated)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.67

Plausible(australia, is sparsely populated) ⋁

Evidence: 0.03

¬ Typical(western australia, was populated)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.37

Plausible(region, is sparsely populated) ⋁

Evidence: 0.03

¬ Typical(western australia, was populated)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.98

Evidence: 0.25

Plausible(western australia, was populated) ⋁

Evidence: 0.19

¬ Plausible(region, is populated)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.98

Evidence: 0.25

Plausible(western australia, was populated) ⋁

Evidence: 0.48

¬ Plausible(australia, is populated)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.25

Plausible(western australia, was populated) ⋁

Evidence: 0.37

¬ Plausible(region, is sparsely populated)

0.04

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.25

Plausible(western australia, was populated) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Plausible(australia, is sparsely populated)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.10

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.98

¬ Remarkable(western australia, was populated) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Remarkable(australia, is sparsely populated)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.13
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.98

¬ Remarkable(western australia, was populated) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Remarkable(region, is sparsely populated)

0.02

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.04
Similarity weight: 0.98

Evidence: 0.98

¬ Remarkable(western australia, was populated) ⋁

Evidence: 0.99

¬ Remarkable(region, is populated)

0.01

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.02
Similarity weight: 0.98

Evidence: 0.98

¬ Remarkable(western australia, was populated) ⋁

Evidence: 1.00

¬ Remarkable(australia, is populated)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.01

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.06
Similarity weight: 0.98

Evidence: 0.98

¬ Remarkable(western australia, was populated) ⋁

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Remarkable(east asia, is populated)

0.01

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.05
Similarity weight: 0.98

Evidence: 0.98

¬ Remarkable(western australia, was populated) ⋁

Evidence: 0.98

¬ Remarkable(sydney, is populated)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.98

Evidence: 0.48

Plausible(australia, is populated) ⋁

Evidence: 0.98

Remarkable(western australia, was populated) ⋁

Evidence: 0.25

¬ Plausible(western australia, was populated)

0.41

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.98

Evidence: 0.19

Plausible(region, is populated) ⋁

Evidence: 0.98

Remarkable(western australia, was populated) ⋁

Evidence: 0.25

¬ Plausible(western australia, was populated)

0.37

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.67

Plausible(australia, is sparsely populated) ⋁

Evidence: 0.98

Remarkable(western australia, was populated) ⋁

Evidence: 0.25

¬ Plausible(western australia, was populated)

0.36

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.37

Plausible(region, is sparsely populated) ⋁

Evidence: 0.98

Remarkable(western australia, was populated) ⋁

Evidence: 0.25

¬ Plausible(western australia, was populated)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.98

Evidence: 0.25

Plausible(western australia, was populated) ⋁

Evidence: 0.98

Remarkable(sydney, is populated) ⋁

Evidence: 0.21

¬ Plausible(sydney, is populated)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.98

Evidence: 0.25

Plausible(western australia, was populated) ⋁

Evidence: 0.96

Remarkable(east asia, is populated) ⋁

Evidence: 0.20

¬ Plausible(east asia, is populated)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.25

Plausible(western australia, was populated) ⋁

Evidence: 0.54

¬ Salient(western australia, was populated)

Similarity expansion

0.83

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.98

Evidence: 0.03

Typical(western australia, was populated) ⋁

Evidence: 0.01

¬ Typical(western australia, is populated)

0.82

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.98

Evidence: 0.98

Remarkable(western australia, was populated) ⋁

Evidence: 0.99

¬ Remarkable(western australia, is populated)

0.73

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.98

Remarkable(western australia, was populated) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Remarkable(western australia, is sparsely populated)

0.73

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.98

Evidence: 0.25

Plausible(western australia, was populated) ⋁

Evidence: 0.18

¬ Plausible(western australia, is populated)

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.98

Evidence: 0.54

Salient(western australia, was populated) ⋁

Evidence: 0.48

¬ Salient(western australia, is populated)

0.51

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.54

Salient(western australia, was populated) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Salient(western australia, is sparsely populated)

0.45

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.25

Plausible(western australia, was populated) ⋁

Evidence: 0.53

¬ Plausible(western australia, is sparsely populated)

0.43

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.03

Typical(western australia, was populated) ⋁

Evidence: 0.44

¬ Typical(western australia, is sparsely populated)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.54

Salient(western australia, was populated) ⋁

Evidence: 0.03

¬ Typical(western australia, was populated) ⋁

Evidence: 0.98

¬ Remarkable(western australia, was populated)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.25

Plausible(western australia, was populated) ⋁

Evidence: 0.03

¬ Typical(western australia, was populated)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.49

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.98

Evidence: 0.98

¬ Remarkable(western australia, was populated) ⋁

Evidence: 0.01

¬ Typical(region, is populated)

0.40

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.98

Evidence: 0.98

¬ Remarkable(western australia, was populated) ⋁

Evidence: 0.21

¬ Typical(australia, is populated)

0.36

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.98

¬ Remarkable(western australia, was populated) ⋁

Evidence: 0.19

¬ Typical(region, is sparsely populated)

0.14

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.98

¬ Remarkable(western australia, was populated) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Typical(australia, is sparsely populated)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.98

Evidence: 0.98

¬ Remarkable(western australia, was populated) ⋁

Evidence: 0.02

¬ Typical(sydney, is populated)

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.98

Evidence: 0.98

¬ Remarkable(western australia, was populated) ⋁

Evidence: 0.03

¬ Typical(east asia, is populated)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.47

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.98

Evidence: 0.03

Typical(western australia, was populated) ⋁

Evidence: 0.01

¬ Typical(region, is populated)

0.38

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.98

Evidence: 0.03

Typical(western australia, was populated) ⋁

Evidence: 0.21

¬ Typical(australia, is populated)

0.35

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.03

Typical(western australia, was populated) ⋁

Evidence: 0.19

¬ Typical(region, is sparsely populated)

0.14

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.03

Typical(western australia, was populated) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Typical(australia, is sparsely populated)