wetland: is are lost

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents ecosystem
Weight: 0.73
, habitat
Weight: 0.71
, land
Weight: 0.65
, activity
Weight: 0.54
, source
Weight: 0.54
Siblings marsh
Weight: 0.71
, estuary
Weight: 0.58
, grassland
Weight: 0.38
, freshwater
Weight: 0.36
, pond
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
is are lost 1.00
is are destroyed 0.82
being are destroyed 0.81
were considered in past 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.24
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(habitat, is are destroyed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(wetland, is are lost)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(wetland, is are lost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(habitat, is are destroyed)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(wetland, is are lost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(habitat, is are destroyed)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(wetland, is are lost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(grassland, is are destroyed)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.26
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(habitat, is are destroyed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(wetland, is are lost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(wetland, is are lost)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(wetland, is are lost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(grassland, is are destroyed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(grassland, is are destroyed)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(wetland, is are lost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(wetland, is are lost)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(wetland, is are lost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(wetland, is are destroyed)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(wetland, is are lost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(wetland, is are destroyed)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(wetland, is are lost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(wetland, is are destroyed)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(wetland, is are lost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(wetland, being are destroyed)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(wetland, is are lost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(wetland, being are destroyed)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(wetland, is are lost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(wetland, being are destroyed)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(wetland, is are lost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(wetland, is are destroyed)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(wetland, is are lost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(wetland, being are destroyed)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(wetland, is are lost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(wetland, were considered in past)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(wetland, is are lost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(wetland, were considered in past)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(wetland, is are lost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(wetland, were considered in past)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(wetland, is are lost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(wetland, were considered in past)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(wetland, is are lost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(wetland, is are lost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(wetland, is are lost)

Typical implies Plausible

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(wetland, is are lost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(wetland, is are lost)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(wetland, is are lost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(habitat, is are destroyed)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(wetland, is are lost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(grassland, is are destroyed)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(wetland, is are lost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(habitat, is are destroyed)