wetland: being are destroyed

Related concepts

Parents	ecosystem Weight: 0.73 , habitat Weight: 0.71 , land Weight: 0.65 , activity Weight: 0.54 , source Weight: 0.54
Siblings	marsh Weight: 0.71 , estuary Weight: 0.58 , grassland Weight: 0.38 , freshwater Weight: 0.36 , pond Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property	Similarity
being are destroyed	1.00
is are destroyed	0.97
be destroyed	0.91
get destroyed	0.90
is are lost	0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.50

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.97

Evidence: 0.01

Plausible(habitat, is are destroyed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.23

¬ Typical(wetland, being are destroyed)

0.46

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.02

Plausible(habitat, get destroyed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.23

¬ Typical(wetland, being are destroyed)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.97

Evidence: 0.03

Plausible(wetland, being are destroyed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.01

¬ Plausible(habitat, is are destroyed)

0.08

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.03

Plausible(wetland, being are destroyed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.02

¬ Plausible(habitat, get destroyed)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.56

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.97

Evidence: 0.03

¬ Remarkable(wetland, being are destroyed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.01

¬ Remarkable(habitat, is are destroyed)

0.52

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.03

¬ Remarkable(wetland, being are destroyed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.02

¬ Remarkable(habitat, get destroyed)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.97

Evidence: 0.03

¬ Remarkable(wetland, being are destroyed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.03

¬ Remarkable(grassland, is are destroyed)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.97

Evidence: 0.01

Plausible(habitat, is are destroyed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.03

Remarkable(wetland, being are destroyed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.03

¬ Plausible(wetland, being are destroyed)

0.37

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.02

Plausible(habitat, get destroyed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.03

Remarkable(wetland, being are destroyed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.03

¬ Plausible(wetland, being are destroyed)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.97

Evidence: 0.03

Plausible(wetland, being are destroyed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.03

Remarkable(grassland, is are destroyed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.03

¬ Plausible(grassland, is are destroyed)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.03

Plausible(wetland, being are destroyed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.03

¬ Salient(wetland, being are destroyed)

Similarity expansion

0.81

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.97

Evidence: 0.03

Remarkable(wetland, being are destroyed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.02

¬ Remarkable(wetland, is are destroyed)

0.81

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.97

Evidence: 0.03

Salient(wetland, being are destroyed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.02

¬ Salient(wetland, is are destroyed)

0.81

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.97

Evidence: 0.03

Plausible(wetland, being are destroyed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.02

¬ Plausible(wetland, is are destroyed)

0.75

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.03

Remarkable(wetland, being are destroyed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.03

¬ Remarkable(wetland, be destroyed)

0.75

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.03

Salient(wetland, being are destroyed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.03

¬ Salient(wetland, be destroyed)

0.75

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.03

Plausible(wetland, being are destroyed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.03

¬ Plausible(wetland, be destroyed)

0.75

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.03

Remarkable(wetland, being are destroyed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.03

¬ Remarkable(wetland, get destroyed)

0.74

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.03

Salient(wetland, being are destroyed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.04

¬ Salient(wetland, get destroyed)

0.74

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.03

Plausible(wetland, being are destroyed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.04

¬ Plausible(wetland, get destroyed)

0.71

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.97

Evidence: 0.23

Typical(wetland, being are destroyed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.18

¬ Typical(wetland, is are destroyed)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.23

Typical(wetland, being are destroyed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.22

¬ Typical(wetland, be destroyed)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.23

Typical(wetland, being are destroyed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Typical(wetland, get destroyed)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.03

Remarkable(wetland, being are destroyed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.16

¬ Remarkable(wetland, is are lost)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.03

Salient(wetland, being are destroyed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.20

¬ Salient(wetland, is are lost)

0.50

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.03

Plausible(wetland, being are destroyed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.29

¬ Plausible(wetland, is are lost)

0.39

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.23

Typical(wetland, being are destroyed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Typical(wetland, is are lost)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.03

Salient(wetland, being are destroyed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.23

¬ Typical(wetland, being are destroyed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.03

¬ Remarkable(wetland, being are destroyed)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.03

Plausible(wetland, being are destroyed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.23

¬ Typical(wetland, being are destroyed)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.49

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.97

Evidence: 0.03

¬ Remarkable(wetland, being are destroyed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.15

¬ Typical(habitat, is are destroyed)

0.46

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.03

¬ Remarkable(wetland, being are destroyed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.16

¬ Typical(habitat, get destroyed)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.97

Evidence: 0.03

¬ Remarkable(wetland, being are destroyed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.22

¬ Typical(grassland, is are destroyed)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.42

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.97

Evidence: 0.23

Typical(wetland, being are destroyed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.15

¬ Typical(habitat, is are destroyed)

0.38

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.23

Typical(wetland, being are destroyed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.16

¬ Typical(habitat, get destroyed)