wetland: be destroyed

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents ecosystem
Weight: 0.73
, habitat
Weight: 0.71
, land
Weight: 0.65
, activity
Weight: 0.54
, source
Weight: 0.54
Siblings marsh
Weight: 0.71
, estuary
Weight: 0.58
, grassland
Weight: 0.38
, freshwater
Weight: 0.36
, pond
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be destroyed 1.00
get destroyed 0.98
is are destroyed 0.94
being are destroyed 0.91

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(habitat, get destroyed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(wetland, be destroyed)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(habitat, is are destroyed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(wetland, be destroyed)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(wetland, be destroyed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(habitat, get destroyed)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(wetland, be destroyed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(habitat, is are destroyed)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.57
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(wetland, be destroyed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(habitat, get destroyed)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(wetland, be destroyed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(habitat, is are destroyed)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(wetland, be destroyed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(grassland, is are destroyed)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(habitat, get destroyed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(wetland, be destroyed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(wetland, be destroyed)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(habitat, is are destroyed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(wetland, be destroyed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(wetland, be destroyed)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(wetland, be destroyed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(grassland, is are destroyed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(grassland, is are destroyed)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(wetland, be destroyed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(wetland, be destroyed)

Similarity expansion

0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(wetland, be destroyed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(wetland, get destroyed)
0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(wetland, be destroyed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(wetland, get destroyed)
0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(wetland, be destroyed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(wetland, get destroyed)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(wetland, be destroyed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(wetland, is are destroyed)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(wetland, be destroyed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(wetland, is are destroyed)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(wetland, be destroyed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(wetland, be destroyed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(wetland, be destroyed)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(wetland, be destroyed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(wetland, be destroyed)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.50
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(wetland, be destroyed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(habitat, get destroyed)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(wetland, be destroyed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(habitat, is are destroyed)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(wetland, be destroyed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(grassland, is are destroyed)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(wetland, be destroyed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(habitat, get destroyed)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(wetland, be destroyed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(habitat, is are destroyed)