whisky: get better with age

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents gift
Weight: 0.54
, product
Weight: 0.53
, alcoholic beverage
Weight: 0.50
, spirit
Weight: 0.48
, article
Weight: 0.46
Siblings dairy product
Weight: 0.28
, drinking beer
Weight: 0.27
, candy
Weight: 0.27
, carbonated beverage
Weight: 0.27
, kindness
Weight: 0.27

Related properties

Property Similarity
get better with age 1.00
has quality better 0.78
be bad for children 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(whisky, get better with age) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(candy, be bad for children)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(whisky, get better with age) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(candy, be bad for children) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(candy, be bad for children)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(whisky, get better with age) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(whisky, get better with age)

Similarity expansion

0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(whisky, get better with age) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(whisky, has quality better)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(whisky, get better with age) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(whisky, has quality better)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(whisky, get better with age) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(whisky, has quality better)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(whisky, get better with age) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(whisky, has quality better)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(whisky, get better with age) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(whisky, get better with age) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(whisky, get better with age)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(whisky, get better with age) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(whisky, get better with age)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(whisky, get better with age) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(candy, be bad for children)