whisky: has quality better

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents gift
Weight: 0.54
, product
Weight: 0.53
, alcoholic beverage
Weight: 0.50
, spirit
Weight: 0.48
, article
Weight: 0.46
Siblings dairy product
Weight: 0.28
, drinking beer
Weight: 0.27
, candy
Weight: 0.27
, carbonated beverage
Weight: 0.27
, kindness
Weight: 0.27

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality better 1.00
has quality good 0.94
has quality bad 0.90
get better with age 0.78
is best 0.76
be more difficult than traditional products 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(article, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(whisky, has quality better)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(gift, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(whisky, has quality better)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(product, be more difficult than traditional products) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(whisky, has quality better)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(spirit, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(whisky, has quality better)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(whisky, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(spirit, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(whisky, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(gift, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(whisky, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(article, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(whisky, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(product, be more difficult than traditional products)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.51
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(whisky, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(spirit, has quality bad)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(whisky, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(gift, has quality good)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(whisky, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(article, has quality good)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(whisky, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(product, be more difficult than traditional products)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(whisky, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(candy, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(whisky, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(drinking beer, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(whisky, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(kindness, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(whisky, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(candy, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(article, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(whisky, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(whisky, has quality better)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(gift, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(whisky, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(whisky, has quality better)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(product, be more difficult than traditional products) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(whisky, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(whisky, has quality better)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(spirit, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(whisky, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(whisky, has quality better)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(whisky, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(candy, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(candy, has quality bad)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(whisky, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(candy, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(candy, has quality good)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(whisky, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(kindness, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(kindness, has quality good)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(whisky, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(drinking beer, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(drinking beer, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(whisky, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(whisky, has quality better)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(whisky, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(whisky, has quality bad)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(whisky, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(whisky, has quality bad)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(whisky, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(whisky, has quality bad)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(whisky, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(whisky, has quality bad)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(whisky, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(whisky, has quality good)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(whisky, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(whisky, get better with age)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(whisky, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(whisky, has quality good)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(whisky, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(whisky, get better with age)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(whisky, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(whisky, has quality good)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(whisky, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(whisky, get better with age)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(whisky, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(whisky, get better with age)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(whisky, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(whisky, has quality good)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(whisky, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(whisky, is best)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(whisky, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(whisky, is best)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(whisky, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(whisky, is best)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(whisky, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(whisky, is best)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(whisky, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(whisky, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(whisky, has quality better)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(whisky, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(whisky, has quality better)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(whisky, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(spirit, has quality bad)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(whisky, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(gift, has quality good)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(whisky, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(article, has quality good)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(whisky, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(product, be more difficult than traditional products)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(whisky, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(candy, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(whisky, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(drinking beer, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(whisky, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(kindness, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(whisky, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(candy, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(whisky, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(spirit, has quality bad)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(whisky, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(gift, has quality good)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(whisky, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(article, has quality good)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(whisky, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(product, be more difficult than traditional products)