white chocolate: has quality bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents milk chocolate
Weight: 0.80
, chocolate
Weight: 0.74
, peanut butter
Weight: 0.67
, ingredient
Weight: 0.66
Siblings frosting
Weight: 0.50
, chocolate bar
Weight: 0.40
, chocolate milk
Weight: 0.40
, hot chocolate
Weight: 0.39
, maple syrup
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality bad 1.00
has quality good 0.96
has quality better 0.90
is quality 0.87
has quality change 0.86
is sooooooooooooooooooo good 0.83
be bad for health 0.81
taste bad 0.80
is very bad 0.80
go bad 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.61
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(chocolate, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(white chocolate, has quality bad)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(peanut butter, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(white chocolate, has quality bad)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(milk chocolate, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(white chocolate, has quality bad)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(peanut butter, is sooooooooooooooooooo good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(white chocolate, has quality bad)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(chocolate, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(white chocolate, has quality bad)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(peanut butter, go bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(white chocolate, has quality bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(white chocolate, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(chocolate, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(white chocolate, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(peanut butter, go bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(white chocolate, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(milk chocolate, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(white chocolate, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(peanut butter, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(white chocolate, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(chocolate, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(white chocolate, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(peanut butter, is sooooooooooooooooooo good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.51
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(white chocolate, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(chocolate, has quality bad)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(white chocolate, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(peanut butter, go bad)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(white chocolate, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(peanut butter, has quality good)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(white chocolate, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(milk chocolate, has quality good)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(white chocolate, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(peanut butter, is sooooooooooooooooooo good)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(white chocolate, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(chocolate, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(white chocolate, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(frosting, go bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(white chocolate, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(maple syrup, go bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(white chocolate, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(maple syrup, has quality good)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(white chocolate, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(frosting, has quality good)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(white chocolate, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(chocolate milk, has quality good)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(white chocolate, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(maple syrup, has quality better)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(white chocolate, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(hot chocolate, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(white chocolate, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(chocolate milk, has quality better)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(white chocolate, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(chocolate milk, has quality change)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(chocolate, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(white chocolate, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(white chocolate, has quality bad)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(peanut butter, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(white chocolate, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(white chocolate, has quality bad)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(milk chocolate, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(white chocolate, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(white chocolate, has quality bad)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(chocolate, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(white chocolate, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(white chocolate, has quality bad)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(peanut butter, is sooooooooooooooooooo good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(white chocolate, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(white chocolate, has quality bad)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(peanut butter, go bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(white chocolate, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(white chocolate, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(white chocolate, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(hot chocolate, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(hot chocolate, has quality good)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(white chocolate, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(frosting, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(frosting, has quality good)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(white chocolate, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(chocolate milk, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(chocolate milk, has quality good)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(white chocolate, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(maple syrup, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(maple syrup, has quality good)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(white chocolate, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(chocolate milk, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(chocolate milk, has quality better)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(white chocolate, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(frosting, go bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(frosting, go bad)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(white chocolate, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(maple syrup, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(maple syrup, has quality better)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(white chocolate, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(chocolate milk, has quality change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(chocolate milk, has quality change)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(white chocolate, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(maple syrup, go bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(maple syrup, go bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(white chocolate, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(white chocolate, has quality bad)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(white chocolate, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(white chocolate, has quality good)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(white chocolate, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(white chocolate, has quality good)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(white chocolate, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(white chocolate, has quality good)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(white chocolate, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(white chocolate, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(white chocolate, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(white chocolate, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(white chocolate, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(white chocolate, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(white chocolate, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(white chocolate, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(chocolate, has quality bad)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(white chocolate, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(peanut butter, go bad)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(white chocolate, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(milk chocolate, has quality good)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(white chocolate, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(peanut butter, has quality good)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(white chocolate, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(chocolate, has quality good)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(white chocolate, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(peanut butter, is sooooooooooooooooooo good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(white chocolate, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(frosting, go bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(white chocolate, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(maple syrup, go bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(white chocolate, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(hot chocolate, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(white chocolate, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(frosting, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(white chocolate, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(chocolate milk, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(white chocolate, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(maple syrup, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(white chocolate, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(chocolate milk, has quality change)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(white chocolate, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(chocolate milk, has quality better)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(white chocolate, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(maple syrup, has quality better)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(white chocolate, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(chocolate, has quality bad)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(white chocolate, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(milk chocolate, has quality good)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(white chocolate, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(peanut butter, has quality good)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(white chocolate, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(chocolate, has quality good)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(white chocolate, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(peanut butter, go bad)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(white chocolate, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(peanut butter, is sooooooooooooooooooo good)