wight: is hot

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents place
Weight: 0.35
, creature
Weight: 0.24
, unit
Weight: 0.19
Siblings winnipeg
Weight: 0.27
, coventry
Weight: 0.27
, tasmania
Weight: 0.27
, brisbane
Weight: 0.27
, sheffield
Weight: 0.27

Related properties

Property Similarity
is hot 1.00
be hot in day 0.92
is hottest 0.81
be hotter in summer 0.79
is cool 0.77
be near equator hot 0.76
be along equator hot 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(wight, is hot)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(brisbane, be hot in day)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(wight, is hot)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(brisbane, is hot)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(wight, is hot)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(winnipeg, is hot)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(wight, is hot)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(winnipeg, be hotter in summer)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(wight, is hot)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(winnipeg, is cool)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(wight, is hot)
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(brisbane, is hot)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(brisbane, is hot)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(wight, is hot)
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(winnipeg, is hot)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(winnipeg, is hot)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(wight, is hot)
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(brisbane, be hot in day)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(brisbane, be hot in day)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(wight, is hot)
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(winnipeg, is cool)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(winnipeg, is cool)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(wight, is hot)
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(winnipeg, be hotter in summer)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(winnipeg, be hotter in summer)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(wight, is hot)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(wight, is hot)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(wight, is hot)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(wight, is hot)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(wight, is hot)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(wight, is hot)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(wight, is hot)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(wight, is hot)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(brisbane, be hot in day)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(wight, is hot)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(brisbane, is hot)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(wight, is hot)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(winnipeg, is hot)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(wight, is hot)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(winnipeg, is cool)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(wight, is hot)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(winnipeg, be hotter in summer)