wild animals: be kept in captivity

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents animal
Weight: 0.67
Siblings saber-toothed cat
Weight: 0.37
, prairie dog
Weight: 0.37
, cougar
Weight: 0.37
, llama
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be kept in captivity 1.00
kept in zoo 0.80
be kept in zoos 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(animal, kept in zoo) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(wild animals, be kept in captivity)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.01
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.08
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(wild animals, be kept in captivity) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(animal, kept in zoo)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(wild animals, be kept in captivity) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(animal, kept in zoo)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(animal, kept in zoo) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(wild animals, be kept in captivity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(wild animals, be kept in captivity)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(wild animals, be kept in captivity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(wild animals, be kept in captivity)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(wild animals, be kept in captivity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(wild animals, be kept in zoos)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.10
Salient(wild animals, be kept in captivity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(wild animals, be kept in zoos)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(wild animals, be kept in captivity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(wild animals, be kept in zoos)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(wild animals, be kept in captivity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(wild animals, kept in zoo)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(wild animals, be kept in captivity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(wild animals, kept in zoo)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Salient(wild animals, be kept in captivity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(wild animals, be kept in captivity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(wild animals, be kept in captivity)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(wild animals, be kept in captivity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(wild animals, be kept in captivity)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(wild animals, be kept in captivity) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(animal, kept in zoo)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.11
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(wild animals, be kept in captivity) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(animal, kept in zoo)