wild animals: be kept in zoos

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents animal
Weight: 0.67
Siblings saber-toothed cat
Weight: 0.37
, prairie dog
Weight: 0.37
, cougar
Weight: 0.37
, llama
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be kept in zoos 1.00
kept in zoo 0.90
put in zoo 0.83
is zoo 0.82
be kept in captivity 0.80
reproduce in zoo 0.79
get caught n put in zoo 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.60
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(animal, kept in zoo) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(wild animals, be kept in zoos)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(animal, put in zoo) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(wild animals, be kept in zoos)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(animal, reproduce in zoo) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(wild animals, be kept in zoos)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.00
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.04
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(wild animals, be kept in zoos) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(animal, kept in zoo)
0.00
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.04
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(wild animals, be kept in zoos) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(animal, put in zoo)
0.00
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.04
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(wild animals, be kept in zoos) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(animal, reproduce in zoo)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.49
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(wild animals, be kept in zoos) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(animal, kept in zoo)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(wild animals, be kept in zoos) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(animal, put in zoo)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(wild animals, be kept in zoos) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(animal, reproduce in zoo)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(wild animals, be kept in zoos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(prairie dog, is zoo)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(animal, kept in zoo) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(wild animals, be kept in zoos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(wild animals, be kept in zoos)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(animal, put in zoo) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(wild animals, be kept in zoos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(wild animals, be kept in zoos)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(animal, reproduce in zoo) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(wild animals, be kept in zoos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(wild animals, be kept in zoos)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(wild animals, be kept in zoos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(prairie dog, is zoo) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(prairie dog, is zoo)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(wild animals, be kept in zoos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(wild animals, be kept in zoos)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(wild animals, be kept in zoos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(wild animals, kept in zoo)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(wild animals, be kept in zoos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(wild animals, kept in zoo)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(wild animals, be kept in zoos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(wild animals, kept in zoo)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(wild animals, be kept in zoos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(wild animals, be kept in captivity)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(wild animals, be kept in zoos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(wild animals, put in zoo)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(wild animals, be kept in zoos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(wild animals, be kept in captivity)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(wild animals, be kept in zoos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(wild animals, put in zoo)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(wild animals, be kept in zoos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(wild animals, put in zoo)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(wild animals, be kept in zoos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(wild animals, be kept in captivity)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(wild animals, be kept in zoos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(wild animals, kept in zoo)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(wild animals, be kept in zoos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(wild animals, be kept in captivity)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(wild animals, be kept in zoos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(wild animals, get caught n put in zoo)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(wild animals, be kept in zoos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(wild animals, put in zoo)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(wild animals, be kept in zoos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(wild animals, get caught n put in zoo)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(wild animals, be kept in zoos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(wild animals, is zoo)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(wild animals, be kept in zoos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(wild animals, reproduce in zoo)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(wild animals, be kept in zoos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(wild animals, get caught n put in zoo)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(wild animals, be kept in zoos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(wild animals, get caught n put in zoo)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(wild animals, be kept in zoos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(wild animals, is zoo)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(wild animals, be kept in zoos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(wild animals, reproduce in zoo)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(wild animals, be kept in zoos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(wild animals, is zoo)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(wild animals, be kept in zoos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(wild animals, is zoo)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(wild animals, be kept in zoos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(wild animals, reproduce in zoo)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(wild animals, be kept in zoos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(wild animals, reproduce in zoo)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(wild animals, be kept in zoos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(wild animals, be kept in zoos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(wild animals, be kept in zoos)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(wild animals, be kept in zoos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(wild animals, be kept in zoos)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(wild animals, be kept in zoos) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(animal, kept in zoo)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(wild animals, be kept in zoos) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(animal, put in zoo)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(wild animals, be kept in zoos) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(animal, reproduce in zoo)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(wild animals, be kept in zoos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(prairie dog, is zoo)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.10
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(wild animals, be kept in zoos) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(animal, kept in zoo)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(wild animals, be kept in zoos) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(animal, put in zoo)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(wild animals, be kept in zoos) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(animal, reproduce in zoo)