animal: kept in zoo

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents creature
Weight: 0.68
, living thing
Weight: 0.62
, mammal
Weight: 0.61
, victim
Weight: 0.59
Siblings llama
Weight: 0.77
, mountain goat
Weight: 0.75
, cougar
Weight: 0.75
, prairie dog
Weight: 0.75

Related properties

Property Similarity
kept in zoo 1.00
be kept in cage in zoo 0.94
put in zoo 0.93
be in zoo 0.93
is zoo 0.92
live at zoo 0.90
be kept in zoos 0.90
be kept at zoos 0.90
be fed in zoo 0.90
survive in zoo 0.89

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(animal, kept in zoo)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(mountain goat, is zoo)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(animal, kept in zoo)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(prairie dog, is zoo)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(animal, kept in zoo)
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(mountain goat, is zoo)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(mountain goat, is zoo)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(animal, kept in zoo)
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(prairie dog, is zoo)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(prairie dog, is zoo)

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(animal, kept in zoo)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Salient(animal, kept in zoo)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 1.00
Salient(animal, kept in zoo)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Salient(animal, put in zoo)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(animal, kept in zoo)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(animal, put in zoo)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 1.00
Typical(animal, kept in zoo)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(animal, put in zoo)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(animal, kept in zoo)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(animal, put in zoo)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 1.00
Salient(animal, kept in zoo)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Salient(animal, be in zoo)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(animal, kept in zoo)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(animal, be in zoo)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 1.00
Typical(animal, kept in zoo)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(animal, be in zoo)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(animal, kept in zoo)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(animal, be in zoo)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 1.00
Salient(animal, kept in zoo)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Salient(animal, live at zoo)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(animal, kept in zoo)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(animal, live at zoo)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 1.00
Typical(animal, kept in zoo)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(animal, live at zoo)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(animal, kept in zoo)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(animal, live at zoo)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 1.00
Salient(animal, kept in zoo)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Salient(animal, be fed in zoo)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(animal, kept in zoo)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(animal, be fed in zoo)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 1.00
Typical(animal, kept in zoo)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(animal, be fed in zoo)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(animal, kept in zoo)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(animal, be fed in zoo)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 1.00
Salient(animal, kept in zoo)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Salient(animal, survive in zoo)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(animal, kept in zoo)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(animal, survive in zoo)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 1.00
Typical(animal, kept in zoo)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(animal, survive in zoo)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(animal, kept in zoo)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(animal, survive in zoo)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
Salient(animal, kept in zoo)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(animal, kept in zoo)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(animal, kept in zoo)

Typical implies Plausible

0.48
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(animal, kept in zoo)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(animal, kept in zoo)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(animal, kept in zoo)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(mountain goat, is zoo)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(animal, kept in zoo)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(prairie dog, is zoo)