animal: be fed in zoo

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents creature
Weight: 0.68
, living thing
Weight: 0.62
, mammal
Weight: 0.61
, victim
Weight: 0.59
Siblings llama
Weight: 0.77
, mountain goat
Weight: 0.75
, cougar
Weight: 0.75
, prairie dog
Weight: 0.75

Related properties

Property Similarity
be fed in zoo 1.00
be fed in zoos 0.91
be in zoo 0.91
is zoo 0.90
put in zoo 0.90
kept in zoo 0.90
live at zoo 0.89
survive in zoo 0.88
be kept in cage in zoo 0.86
reproduce in zoo 0.86

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(animal, be fed in zoo) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(mountain goat, is zoo)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(animal, be fed in zoo) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(prairie dog, is zoo)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(animal, be fed in zoo) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(mountain goat, is zoo) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(mountain goat, is zoo)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(animal, be fed in zoo) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(prairie dog, is zoo) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(prairie dog, is zoo)

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(animal, be fed in zoo) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Salient(animal, be fed in zoo)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 1.00
Typical(animal, be fed in zoo) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(animal, be in zoo)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(animal, be fed in zoo) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(animal, be in zoo)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 1.00
Salient(animal, be fed in zoo) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Salient(animal, be in zoo)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 1.00
Typical(animal, be fed in zoo) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(animal, put in zoo)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(animal, be fed in zoo) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(animal, put in zoo)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
Salient(animal, be fed in zoo) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(animal, be fed in zoo) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(animal, be fed in zoo)

Typical implies Plausible

0.48
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(animal, be fed in zoo) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(animal, be fed in zoo)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(animal, be fed in zoo) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(mountain goat, is zoo)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(animal, be fed in zoo) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(prairie dog, is zoo)