animal: be in zoo

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents creature
Weight: 0.68
, living thing
Weight: 0.62
, mammal
Weight: 0.61
, victim
Weight: 0.59
Siblings llama
Weight: 0.77
, mountain goat
Weight: 0.75
, cougar
Weight: 0.75
, prairie dog
Weight: 0.75

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in zoo 1.00
is zoo 1.00
put in zoo 0.96
live at zoo 0.96
survive in zoo 0.94
kept in zoo 0.93
be fed in zoo 0.91
reproduce in zoo 0.91
be uncomfortable in zoo 0.90
suffer in zoo 0.90

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(animal, be in zoo)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(mountain goat, is zoo)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(animal, be in zoo)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(prairie dog, is zoo)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(animal, be in zoo)
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(mountain goat, is zoo)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(mountain goat, is zoo)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(animal, be in zoo)
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(prairie dog, is zoo)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(prairie dog, is zoo)

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(animal, be in zoo)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Salient(animal, be in zoo)

Similarity expansion

0.82
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 1.00
Salient(animal, be in zoo)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Salient(animal, put in zoo)
0.82
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(animal, be in zoo)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(animal, put in zoo)
0.82
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 1.00
Typical(animal, be in zoo)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(animal, put in zoo)
0.82
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(animal, be in zoo)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(animal, put in zoo)
0.82
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 1.00
Salient(animal, be in zoo)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Salient(animal, live at zoo)
0.82
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(animal, be in zoo)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(animal, live at zoo)
0.82
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 1.00
Typical(animal, be in zoo)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(animal, live at zoo)
0.82
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(animal, be in zoo)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(animal, live at zoo)
0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 1.00
Salient(animal, be in zoo)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Salient(animal, survive in zoo)
0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(animal, be in zoo)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(animal, survive in zoo)
0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 1.00
Typical(animal, be in zoo)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(animal, survive in zoo)
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(animal, be in zoo)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(animal, survive in zoo)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 1.00
Salient(animal, be in zoo)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Salient(animal, kept in zoo)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(animal, be in zoo)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(animal, kept in zoo)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 1.00
Typical(animal, be in zoo)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(animal, kept in zoo)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(animal, be in zoo)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(animal, kept in zoo)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 1.00
Salient(animal, be in zoo)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Salient(animal, be fed in zoo)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(animal, be in zoo)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(animal, be fed in zoo)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 1.00
Typical(animal, be in zoo)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(animal, be fed in zoo)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(animal, be in zoo)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(animal, be fed in zoo)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 1.00
Salient(animal, be in zoo)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Salient(animal, reproduce in zoo)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(animal, be in zoo)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(animal, reproduce in zoo)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 1.00
Typical(animal, be in zoo)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(animal, reproduce in zoo)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(animal, be in zoo)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(animal, reproduce in zoo)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 1.00
Salient(animal, be in zoo)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Salient(animal, be uncomfortable in zoo)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(animal, be in zoo)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(animal, be uncomfortable in zoo)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 1.00
Typical(animal, be in zoo)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(animal, be uncomfortable in zoo)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(animal, be in zoo)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(animal, be uncomfortable in zoo)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 1.00
Salient(animal, be in zoo)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Salient(animal, suffer in zoo)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(animal, be in zoo)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(animal, suffer in zoo)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 1.00
Typical(animal, be in zoo)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(animal, suffer in zoo)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(animal, be in zoo)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(animal, suffer in zoo)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
Salient(animal, be in zoo)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(animal, be in zoo)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(animal, be in zoo)

Typical implies Plausible

0.48
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(animal, be in zoo)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(animal, be in zoo)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(animal, be in zoo)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(mountain goat, is zoo)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(animal, be in zoo)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(prairie dog, is zoo)