animal: put in zoo

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents creature
Weight: 0.68
, living thing
Weight: 0.62
, mammal
Weight: 0.61
, victim
Weight: 0.59
Siblings llama
Weight: 0.77
, mountain goat
Weight: 0.75
, cougar
Weight: 0.75
, prairie dog
Weight: 0.75

Related properties

Property Similarity
put in zoo 1.00
be in zoo 0.96
is zoo 0.96
live at zoo 0.93
kept in zoo 0.93
survive in zoo 0.92
be fed in zoo 0.90
be kept in cage in zoo 0.89
reproduce in zoo 0.89
be uncomfortable in zoo 0.89

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(animal, put in zoo) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(mountain goat, is zoo)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(animal, put in zoo) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(prairie dog, is zoo)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(animal, put in zoo) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(mountain goat, is zoo) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(mountain goat, is zoo)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(animal, put in zoo) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(prairie dog, is zoo) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(prairie dog, is zoo)

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(animal, put in zoo) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Salient(animal, put in zoo)

Similarity expansion

0.82
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 1.00
Salient(animal, put in zoo) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Salient(animal, be in zoo)
0.82
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(animal, put in zoo) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(animal, be in zoo)
0.82
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 1.00
Typical(animal, put in zoo) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(animal, be in zoo)
0.82
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(animal, put in zoo) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(animal, be in zoo)
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 1.00
Salient(animal, put in zoo) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Salient(animal, live at zoo)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
Salient(animal, put in zoo) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(animal, put in zoo) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(animal, put in zoo)

Typical implies Plausible

0.48
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(animal, put in zoo) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(animal, put in zoo)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(animal, put in zoo) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(mountain goat, is zoo)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(animal, put in zoo) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(prairie dog, is zoo)