wilderness: be in danger

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents area
Weight: 0.62
, national forest
Weight: 0.61
, battle
Weight: 0.59
, land
Weight: 0.59
Siblings national parks
Weight: 0.64
, national park
Weight: 0.33
, yellowstone national park
Weight: 0.33
, wildlife
Weight: 0.33
, shoreline
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in danger 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(wilderness, be in danger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(national park, be in danger)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(wilderness, be in danger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(yellowstone national park, be in danger)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(wilderness, be in danger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(wildlife, be in danger)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(wilderness, be in danger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(wildlife, be in danger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(wildlife, be in danger)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(wilderness, be in danger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(yellowstone national park, be in danger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(yellowstone national park, be in danger)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(wilderness, be in danger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(national park, be in danger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(national park, be in danger)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(wilderness, be in danger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(wilderness, be in danger)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(wilderness, be in danger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(wilderness, be in danger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(wilderness, be in danger)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(wilderness, be in danger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(wilderness, be in danger)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(wilderness, be in danger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(wildlife, be in danger)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(wilderness, be in danger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(national park, be in danger)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(wilderness, be in danger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(yellowstone national park, be in danger)