wine: be more popular than white

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents drink
Weight: 0.64
, beverage
Weight: 0.64
, alcoholic beverage
Weight: 0.64
, indulgence
Weight: 0.63
Siblings red wine
Weight: 0.79
, madeira
Weight: 0.69
, wine cellar
Weight: 0.67
, vermouth
Weight: 0.64
, grape juice
Weight: 0.64

Related properties

Property Similarity
be more popular than white 1.00
be more expensive than white 0.94
be better than white 0.90
be stronger than white 0.86
be better than red 0.84
be cheaper than red 0.84
be more acidic than red 0.80
be more expensive than beer 0.79
be sweeter than red 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(wine, be more popular than white)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(red wine, be more popular than white)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(wine, be more popular than white)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(red wine, be more expensive than white)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(wine, be more popular than white)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(red wine, be better than white)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(wine, be more popular than white)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(red wine, be stronger than white)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(wine, be more popular than white)
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(red wine, be more popular than white)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(red wine, be more popular than white)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(wine, be more popular than white)
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(red wine, be more expensive than white)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(red wine, be more expensive than white)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(wine, be more popular than white)
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(red wine, be better than white)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(red wine, be better than white)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(wine, be more popular than white)
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(red wine, be stronger than white)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(red wine, be stronger than white)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(wine, be more popular than white)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(wine, be more popular than white)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(wine, be more popular than white)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(wine, be more expensive than white)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.52
Salient(wine, be more popular than white)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(wine, be more expensive than white)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(wine, be more popular than white)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(wine, be more expensive than white)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(wine, be more popular than white)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(wine, be more expensive than white)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(wine, be more popular than white)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(wine, be better than white)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(wine, be more popular than white)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(wine, be more expensive than beer)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.52
Salient(wine, be more popular than white)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(wine, be more expensive than beer)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(wine, be more popular than white)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(wine, be better than red)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.52
Salient(wine, be more popular than white)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(wine, be better than red)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(wine, be more popular than white)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(wine, be better than red)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(wine, be more popular than white)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(wine, be more expensive than beer)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(wine, be more popular than white)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(wine, be more expensive than beer)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(wine, be more popular than white)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(wine, be better than red)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(wine, be more popular than white)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(wine, be cheaper than red)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(wine, be more popular than white)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(wine, be stronger than white)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(wine, be more popular than white)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(wine, be more acidic than red)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(wine, be more popular than white)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(wine, be more acidic than red)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.52
Salient(wine, be more popular than white)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(wine, be more acidic than red)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.52
Salient(wine, be more popular than white)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(wine, be cheaper than red)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(wine, be more popular than white)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(wine, be cheaper than red)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(wine, be more popular than white)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(wine, be sweeter than red)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(wine, be more popular than white)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(wine, be cheaper than red)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(wine, be more popular than white)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(wine, be better than white)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(wine, be more popular than white)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(wine, be better than white)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.52
Salient(wine, be more popular than white)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(wine, be sweeter than red)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.52
Salient(wine, be more popular than white)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(wine, be better than white)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(wine, be more popular than white)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(wine, be sweeter than red)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(wine, be more popular than white)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(wine, be more acidic than red)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(wine, be more popular than white)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(wine, be sweeter than red)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(wine, be more popular than white)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(wine, be stronger than white)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(wine, be more popular than white)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(wine, be stronger than white)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.52
Salient(wine, be more popular than white)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(wine, be stronger than white)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Salient(wine, be more popular than white)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(wine, be more popular than white)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(wine, be more popular than white)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(wine, be more popular than white)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(wine, be more popular than white)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(wine, be more popular than white)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(red wine, be more popular than white)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(wine, be more popular than white)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(red wine, be more expensive than white)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(wine, be more popular than white)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(red wine, be better than white)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(wine, be more popular than white)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(red wine, be stronger than white)