wine: be better than white

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents drink
Weight: 0.64
, beverage
Weight: 0.64
, alcoholic beverage
Weight: 0.64
, indulgence
Weight: 0.63
Siblings red wine
Weight: 0.79
, madeira
Weight: 0.69
, wine cellar
Weight: 0.67
, vermouth
Weight: 0.64
, grape juice
Weight: 0.64

Related properties

Property Similarity
be better than white 1.00
be stronger than white 0.93
be better than red 0.93
be more expensive than white 0.91
be more popular than white 0.90
be cheaper than red 0.85
be sweeter than red 0.82
be better than beer 0.79
be more acidic than red 0.77
be considered of higher class than beer 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(wine, be better than white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(red wine, be better than white)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(wine, be better than white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(red wine, be stronger than white)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(wine, be better than white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(red wine, be more expensive than white)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(wine, be better than white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(red wine, be more popular than white)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(wine, be better than white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(red wine, be better than beer)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(wine, be better than white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(red wine, be better than white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(red wine, be better than white)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(wine, be better than white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(red wine, be more expensive than white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(red wine, be more expensive than white)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(wine, be better than white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(red wine, be stronger than white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(red wine, be stronger than white)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(wine, be better than white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(red wine, be more popular than white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(red wine, be more popular than white)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(wine, be better than white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(red wine, be better than beer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(red wine, be better than beer)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(wine, be better than white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(wine, be better than white)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(wine, be better than white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(wine, be better than red)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(wine, be better than white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(wine, be better than red)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(wine, be better than white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(wine, be better than red)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(wine, be better than white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(wine, be better than red)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(wine, be better than white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(wine, be more expensive than white)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(wine, be better than white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(wine, be more expensive than white)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(wine, be better than white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(wine, be more expensive than white)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(wine, be better than white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(wine, be more expensive than white)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(wine, be better than white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(wine, be stronger than white)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(wine, be better than white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(wine, be better than beer)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(wine, be better than white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(wine, be better than beer)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(wine, be better than white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(wine, be more popular than white)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(wine, be better than white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(wine, be better than beer)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(wine, be better than white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(wine, be better than beer)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(wine, be better than white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(wine, be cheaper than red)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(wine, be better than white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(wine, be stronger than white)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(wine, be better than white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(wine, be sweeter than red)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(wine, be better than white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(wine, be sweeter than red)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(wine, be better than white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(wine, be cheaper than red)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(wine, be better than white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(wine, be cheaper than red)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(wine, be better than white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(wine, be sweeter than red)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(wine, be better than white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(wine, be sweeter than red)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(wine, be better than white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(wine, be more popular than white)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(wine, be better than white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(wine, be more acidic than red)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(wine, be better than white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(wine, be more acidic than red)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(wine, be better than white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(wine, be cheaper than red)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(wine, be better than white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(wine, be more acidic than red)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(wine, be better than white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(wine, be stronger than white)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(wine, be better than white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(wine, be more popular than white)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(wine, be better than white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(wine, be stronger than white)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(wine, be better than white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(wine, be more popular than white)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(wine, be better than white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(wine, be more acidic than red)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(wine, be better than white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(wine, be better than white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(wine, be better than white)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(wine, be better than white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(wine, be better than white)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(wine, be better than white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(red wine, be better than white)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(wine, be better than white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(red wine, be more expensive than white)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(wine, be better than white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(red wine, be stronger than white)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(wine, be better than white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(red wine, be more popular than white)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(wine, be better than white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(red wine, be better than beer)