red wine: be better than white

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents white wine
Weight: 0.89
, wine
Weight: 0.79
, alcoholic beverage
Weight: 0.70
, food
Weight: 0.68
Siblings burgundy
Weight: 0.60
, claret
Weight: 0.56
, grape juice
Weight: 0.37
, madeira
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
be better than white 1.00
be stronger than white 0.93
be more expensive than white 0.91
be more popular than white 0.90
be better than white wine 0.86
be healthier than white wine 0.82
be more expensive than white wine 0.82
have higher proof than white wine 0.81
taste oakier than whites 0.80
be better than beer 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.66
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(food, be better than white)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(red wine, be better than white)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(wine, be better than white wine)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(red wine, be better than white)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(wine, be better than white)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(red wine, be better than white)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(wine, be healthier than white wine)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(red wine, be better than white)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(wine, be more expensive than white wine)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(red wine, be better than white)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(wine, be stronger than white)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(red wine, be better than white)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(wine, be more popular than white)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(red wine, be better than white)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(wine, be more expensive than white)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(red wine, be better than white)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(wine, be better than beer)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(red wine, be better than white)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(red wine, be better than white)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(wine, be better than beer)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(red wine, be better than white)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(wine, be more expensive than white)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(red wine, be better than white)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(wine, be better than white)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(red wine, be better than white)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(wine, be more popular than white)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(red wine, be better than white)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(wine, be stronger than white)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.17
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(red wine, be better than white)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(food, be better than white)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.19
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(red wine, be better than white)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(wine, be better than white wine)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.19
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(red wine, be better than white)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(wine, be more expensive than white wine)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.19
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(red wine, be better than white)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(wine, be healthier than white wine)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.55
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(red wine, be better than white)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(wine, be better than white)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(red wine, be better than white)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(wine, be stronger than white)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(red wine, be better than white)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(wine, be more expensive than white)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(red wine, be better than white)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(food, be better than white)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(red wine, be better than white)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(wine, be more popular than white)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(red wine, be better than white)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(wine, be better than white wine)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(red wine, be better than white)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(wine, be better than beer)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(red wine, be better than white)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(wine, be more expensive than white wine)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(red wine, be better than white)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(wine, be healthier than white wine)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(food, be better than white)
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(red wine, be better than white)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(red wine, be better than white)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(wine, be better than white)
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(red wine, be better than white)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(red wine, be better than white)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(wine, be stronger than white)
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(red wine, be better than white)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(red wine, be better than white)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(wine, be better than white wine)
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(red wine, be better than white)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(red wine, be better than white)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(wine, be more popular than white)
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(red wine, be better than white)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(red wine, be better than white)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(wine, be healthier than white wine)
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(red wine, be better than white)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(red wine, be better than white)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(wine, be more expensive than white wine)
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(red wine, be better than white)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(red wine, be better than white)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(wine, be more expensive than white)
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(red wine, be better than white)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(red wine, be better than white)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(wine, be better than beer)
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(red wine, be better than white)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(red wine, be better than white)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(red wine, be better than white)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(red wine, be better than white)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(red wine, be better than white)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(red wine, be more expensive than white)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(red wine, be better than white)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(red wine, be more expensive than white)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.15
Salient(red wine, be better than white)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(red wine, be more expensive than white)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(red wine, be better than white)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(red wine, be stronger than white)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(red wine, be better than white)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(red wine, be stronger than white)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.15
Salient(red wine, be better than white)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(red wine, be stronger than white)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(red wine, be better than white)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(red wine, be more popular than white)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(red wine, be better than white)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(red wine, be more popular than white)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.15
Salient(red wine, be better than white)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(red wine, be more popular than white)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(red wine, be better than white)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(red wine, be more expensive than white)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(red wine, be better than white)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(red wine, be stronger than white)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(red wine, be better than white)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(red wine, be more popular than white)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(red wine, be better than white)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(red wine, be more expensive than white wine)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(red wine, be better than white)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(red wine, be healthier than white wine)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(red wine, be better than white)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(red wine, have higher proof than white wine)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.15
Salient(red wine, be better than white)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(red wine, be more expensive than white wine)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.15
Salient(red wine, be better than white)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(red wine, have higher proof than white wine)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(red wine, be better than white)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(red wine, be better than white wine)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.15
Salient(red wine, be better than white)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(red wine, be healthier than white wine)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(red wine, be better than white)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(red wine, be better than beer)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(red wine, be better than white)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(red wine, be more expensive than white wine)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.15
Salient(red wine, be better than white)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(red wine, be better than beer)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(red wine, be better than white)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(red wine, have higher proof than white wine)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.15
Salient(red wine, be better than white)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(red wine, be better than white wine)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(red wine, be better than white)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(red wine, be healthier than white wine)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(red wine, be better than white)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(red wine, be better than beer)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(red wine, be better than white)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(red wine, be better than beer)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(red wine, be better than white)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(red wine, have higher proof than white wine)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(red wine, be better than white)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(red wine, be more expensive than white wine)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(red wine, be better than white)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(red wine, be healthier than white wine)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(red wine, be better than white)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(red wine, be better than white wine)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(red wine, be better than white)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(red wine, be better than white wine)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Salient(red wine, be better than white)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(red wine, be better than white)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(red wine, be better than white)

Typical implies Plausible

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(red wine, be better than white)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(red wine, be better than white)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(red wine, be better than white)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(wine, be better than white)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(red wine, be better than white)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(food, be better than white)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(red wine, be better than white)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(wine, be more expensive than white)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(red wine, be better than white)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(wine, be stronger than white)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(red wine, be better than white)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(wine, be more popular than white)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(red wine, be better than white)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(wine, be better than beer)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(red wine, be better than white)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(wine, be better than white wine)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(red wine, be better than white)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(wine, be healthier than white wine)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(red wine, be better than white)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(wine, be more expensive than white wine)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(red wine, be better than white)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(wine, be better than beer)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(red wine, be better than white)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(wine, be more expensive than white)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(red wine, be better than white)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(wine, be better than white)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(red wine, be better than white)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(wine, be stronger than white)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(red wine, be better than white)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(wine, be more popular than white)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(red wine, be better than white)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(food, be better than white)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(red wine, be better than white)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(wine, be better than white wine)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(red wine, be better than white)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(wine, be healthier than white wine)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(red wine, be better than white)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(wine, be more expensive than white wine)