woodpecker: be at forest

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents wildlife
Weight: 0.65
, creature
Weight: 0.64
, bird
Weight: 0.52
, animal
Weight: 0.51
Siblings tree frog
Weight: 0.37
, peregrine falcon
Weight: 0.37
, lizard
Weight: 0.37
, owl
Weight: 0.36
, frog
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at forest 1.00
be at in forest 0.99
be find in forest 0.96
be at woodland 0.82
be at tropical rainforest 0.79
land on tree 0.77
be at it natural habitat 0.77
be at wilderness area away from person 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.62
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(wildlife, be at forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(woodpecker, be at forest)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(creature, be at forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(woodpecker, be at forest)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(animal, be at in forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(woodpecker, be at forest)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(animal, be at woodland) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(woodpecker, be at forest)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(woodpecker, be at forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(animal, be at in forest)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(woodpecker, be at forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(creature, be at forest)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(woodpecker, be at forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(animal, be at woodland)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(woodpecker, be at forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(wildlife, be at forest)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(woodpecker, be at forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(animal, be at in forest)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(woodpecker, be at forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(creature, be at forest)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(woodpecker, be at forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(animal, be at woodland)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(woodpecker, be at forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(wildlife, be at forest)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(woodpecker, be at forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(frog, be at forest)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(woodpecker, be at forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(owl, be at in forest)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.10
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(woodpecker, be at forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(tree frog, be at forest)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(wildlife, be at forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(woodpecker, be at forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(woodpecker, be at forest)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(creature, be at forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(woodpecker, be at forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(woodpecker, be at forest)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(animal, be at in forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(woodpecker, be at forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(woodpecker, be at forest)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(animal, be at woodland) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(woodpecker, be at forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(woodpecker, be at forest)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(woodpecker, be at forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(tree frog, be at forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(tree frog, be at forest)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(woodpecker, be at forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(owl, be at in forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(owl, be at in forest)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(woodpecker, be at forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(frog, be at forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(frog, be at forest)

Salient implies Plausible

0.02
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.07
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(woodpecker, be at forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(woodpecker, be at forest)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(woodpecker, be at forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(woodpecker, be at forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(woodpecker, be at forest)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(woodpecker, be at forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(woodpecker, be at forest)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(woodpecker, be at forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(wildlife, be at forest)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(woodpecker, be at forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(creature, be at forest)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(woodpecker, be at forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(animal, be at woodland)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(woodpecker, be at forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(animal, be at in forest)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(woodpecker, be at forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(tree frog, be at forest)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(woodpecker, be at forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(owl, be at in forest)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(woodpecker, be at forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(frog, be at forest)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Typical(woodpecker, be at forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(wildlife, be at forest)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Typical(woodpecker, be at forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(creature, be at forest)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.15
Typical(woodpecker, be at forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(animal, be at woodland)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.15
Typical(woodpecker, be at forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(animal, be at in forest)