tree frog: be at forest

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents creature
Weight: 0.77
, amphibian
Weight: 0.77
, animal
Weight: 0.71
, frog
Weight: 0.64
, reptile
Weight: 0.62
Siblings lizard
Weight: 0.40
, tree
Weight: 0.39
, rabbit
Weight: 0.38
, monkey
Weight: 0.38
, owl
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at forest 1.00
be at in forest 0.99
be a part of forest 0.97
be find in forest 0.96
be at tropical forest 0.88
be at rain forest 0.88
has fall down in forest 0.87
be find in group call forest 0.87
be at zoo or tropical forest 0.86
be at indian forest 0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.60
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(frog, be at forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(tree frog, be at forest)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(creature, be at forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(tree frog, be at forest)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(animal, be at in forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(tree frog, be at forest)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(tree frog, be at forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(animal, be at in forest)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(tree frog, be at forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(creature, be at forest)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(tree frog, be at forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(frog, be at forest)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.51
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(tree frog, be at forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(frog, be at forest)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(tree frog, be at forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(animal, be at in forest)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(tree frog, be at forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(creature, be at forest)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(tree frog, be at forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(monkey, be at rain forest)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(tree frog, be at forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(monkey, be at tropical forest)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(tree frog, be at forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(owl, be at in forest)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(tree frog, be at forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(monkey, be at indian forest)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(tree frog, be at forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(monkey, be at zoo or tropical forest)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(tree frog, be at forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(tree, be find in group call forest)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(tree frog, be at forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(tree, be at in forest)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(tree frog, be at forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(tree, be a part of forest)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(tree frog, be at forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(tree, be find in forest)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.18
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(tree frog, be at forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(tree, has fall down in forest)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(frog, be at forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(tree frog, be at forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(tree frog, be at forest)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(creature, be at forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(tree frog, be at forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(tree frog, be at forest)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(animal, be at in forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(tree frog, be at forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(tree frog, be at forest)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(tree frog, be at forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(owl, be at in forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(owl, be at in forest)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(tree frog, be at forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(tree, be at in forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(tree, be at in forest)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(tree frog, be at forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(tree, be a part of forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(tree, be a part of forest)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(tree frog, be at forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(tree, be find in forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(tree, be find in forest)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(tree frog, be at forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(tree, be find in group call forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(tree, be find in group call forest)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(tree frog, be at forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(tree, has fall down in forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(tree, has fall down in forest)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(tree frog, be at forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(monkey, be at indian forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(monkey, be at indian forest)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(tree frog, be at forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(monkey, be at tropical forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(monkey, be at tropical forest)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(tree frog, be at forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(monkey, be at zoo or tropical forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(monkey, be at zoo or tropical forest)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(tree frog, be at forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(monkey, be at rain forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(monkey, be at rain forest)

Salient implies Plausible

0.02
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.07
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(tree frog, be at forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(tree frog, be at forest)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(tree frog, be at forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(tree frog, be at forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(tree frog, be at forest)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(tree frog, be at forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(tree frog, be at forest)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(tree frog, be at forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(creature, be at forest)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(tree frog, be at forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(animal, be at in forest)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(tree frog, be at forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(frog, be at forest)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(tree frog, be at forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(tree, has fall down in forest)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(tree frog, be at forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(tree, be at in forest)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(tree frog, be at forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(monkey, be at zoo or tropical forest)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(tree frog, be at forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(tree, be a part of forest)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(tree frog, be at forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(tree, be find in forest)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(tree frog, be at forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(monkey, be at tropical forest)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(tree frog, be at forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(owl, be at in forest)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(tree frog, be at forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(monkey, be at indian forest)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(tree frog, be at forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(monkey, be at rain forest)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(tree frog, be at forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(tree, be find in group call forest)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.19
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(tree frog, be at forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(creature, be at forest)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(tree frog, be at forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(animal, be at in forest)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(tree frog, be at forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(frog, be at forest)