woodpecker: have long tongues

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents species
Weight: 0.65
, wildlife
Weight: 0.65
, creature
Weight: 0.64
, bird
Weight: 0.52
Siblings chickadee
Weight: 0.43
, peregrine falcon
Weight: 0.37
, tree frog
Weight: 0.37
, lizard
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
have long tongues 1.00
have long beaks 0.80
need beaks 0.75
have sharp beaks 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(woodpecker, have long tongues) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(woodpecker, have long tongues)

Similarity expansion

0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(woodpecker, have long tongues) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(woodpecker, have sharp beaks)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(woodpecker, have long tongues) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(woodpecker, have long beaks)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(woodpecker, have long tongues) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(woodpecker, need beaks)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(woodpecker, have long tongues) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(woodpecker, have sharp beaks)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(woodpecker, have long tongues) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(woodpecker, have long beaks)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(woodpecker, have long tongues) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(woodpecker, have sharp beaks)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(woodpecker, have long tongues) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(woodpecker, have sharp beaks)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(woodpecker, have long tongues) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(woodpecker, have long beaks)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(woodpecker, have long tongues) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(woodpecker, have long beaks)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(woodpecker, have long tongues) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(woodpecker, need beaks)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(woodpecker, have long tongues) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(woodpecker, need beaks)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(woodpecker, have long tongues) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(woodpecker, need beaks)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(woodpecker, have long tongues) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(woodpecker, have long tongues) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(woodpecker, have long tongues)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(woodpecker, have long tongues) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(woodpecker, have long tongues)