writing: be developed

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents subject
Weight: 0.60
, work
Weight: 0.59
, matter
Weight: 0.58
, quality
Weight: 0.56
, production
Weight: 0.56
Siblings entry
Weight: 0.56
, reading
Weight: 0.35
, write
Weight: 0.34
, read
Weight: 0.33
, grammar
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be developed 1.00
was developed 0.96
was first developed 0.89
was created 0.76
was invented 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(writing, be developed)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(writing, be developed)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(writing, be developed)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(writing, was developed)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(writing, be developed)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(writing, was first developed)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(writing, be developed)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(writing, was created)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(writing, be developed)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(writing, was invented)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(writing, be developed)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(writing, was developed)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(writing, be developed)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(writing, was developed)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(writing, be developed)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(writing, was developed)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(writing, be developed)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(writing, was created)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(writing, be developed)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(writing, was created)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(writing, be developed)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(writing, was created)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(writing, be developed)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(writing, was first developed)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(writing, be developed)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(writing, was invented)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(writing, be developed)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(writing, was invented)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(writing, be developed)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(writing, was invented)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(writing, be developed)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(writing, was first developed)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.15
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(writing, be developed)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(writing, was first developed)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(writing, be developed)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(writing, be developed)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(writing, be developed)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(writing, be developed)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(writing, be developed)