writing: was first developed

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents subject
Weight: 0.60
, work
Weight: 0.59
, matter
Weight: 0.58
, quality
Weight: 0.56
, production
Weight: 0.56
Siblings entry
Weight: 0.56
, reading
Weight: 0.35
, write
Weight: 0.34
, read
Weight: 0.33
, grammar
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
was first developed 1.00
was developed 0.94
be developed 0.89
was created 0.82
was first invented in sumer 0.79
was invented 0.79
was important development to early man 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(writing, was first developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(writing, was first developed)

Similarity expansion

0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(writing, was first developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(writing, was developed)
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(writing, was first developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(writing, was developed)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(writing, was first developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(writing, was developed)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(writing, was first developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(writing, be developed)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(writing, was first developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(writing, be developed)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(writing, was first developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(writing, be developed)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(writing, was first developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(writing, was created)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(writing, was first developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(writing, was created)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(writing, was first developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(writing, was created)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(writing, was first developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(writing, was first invented in sumer)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(writing, was first developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(writing, was invented)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(writing, was first developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(writing, was first invented in sumer)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(writing, was first developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(writing, was invented)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(writing, was first developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(writing, was invented)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(writing, was first developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(writing, was first invented in sumer)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(writing, was first developed) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Salient(writing, was important development to early man)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(writing, was first developed) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(writing, was important development to early man)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(writing, was first developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(writing, was important development to early man)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(writing, was first developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(writing, was developed)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(writing, was first developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(writing, was first invented in sumer)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(writing, was first developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(writing, be developed)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(writing, was first developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(writing, was important development to early man)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(writing, was first developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(writing, was invented)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(writing, was first developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(writing, was created)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(writing, was first developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(writing, was first developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(writing, was first developed)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(writing, was first developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(writing, was first developed)