writing: was developed

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents subject
Weight: 0.60
, work
Weight: 0.59
, matter
Weight: 0.58
, quality
Weight: 0.56
, production
Weight: 0.56
Siblings entry
Weight: 0.56
, reading
Weight: 0.35
, write
Weight: 0.34
, read
Weight: 0.33
, grammar
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
was developed 1.00
be developed 0.96
was first developed 0.94
was created 0.83
was invented 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(writing, was developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(writing, was developed)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(writing, was developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(writing, be developed)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(writing, was developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(writing, was first developed)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(writing, was developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(writing, be developed)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(writing, was developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(writing, be developed)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(writing, was developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(writing, be developed)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(writing, was developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(writing, was created)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(writing, was developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(writing, was created)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(writing, was developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(writing, was invented)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(writing, was developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(writing, was first developed)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(writing, was developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(writing, was created)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(writing, was developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(writing, was created)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(writing, was developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(writing, was invented)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(writing, was developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(writing, was invented)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(writing, was developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(writing, was first developed)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(writing, was developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(writing, was invented)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(writing, was developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(writing, was first developed)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(writing, was developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(writing, was developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(writing, was developed)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(writing, was developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(writing, was developed)