york: was unique

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents city
Weight: 0.60
, new york
Weight: 0.57
, place
Weight: 0.57
, town
Weight: 0.54
Siblings new york city
Weight: 0.40
, washington
Weight: 0.35
, mexico city
Weight: 0.35
, london
Weight: 0.34
, philadelphia
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
was unique 1.00
was such diverse place in late 1600s 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.34
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(new york, was unique) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(york, was unique)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(new york, was such diverse place in late 1600s) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(york, was unique)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(york, was unique) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(new york, was unique)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(york, was unique) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(new york, was such diverse place in late 1600s)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.10
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.17
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(york, was unique) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(new york, was unique)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.18
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(york, was unique) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(new york, was such diverse place in late 1600s)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(new york, was unique) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(york, was unique) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(york, was unique)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(new york, was such diverse place in late 1600s) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(york, was unique) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(york, was unique)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(york, was unique) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(york, was unique)

Similarity expansion

0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(york, was unique) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(york, was such diverse place in late 1600s)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(york, was unique) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(york, was such diverse place in late 1600s)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(york, was unique) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(york, was such diverse place in late 1600s)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(york, was unique) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(york, was such diverse place in late 1600s)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(york, was unique) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(york, was unique) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(york, was unique)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(york, was unique) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(york, was unique)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(york, was unique) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(new york, was unique)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(york, was unique) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(new york, was such diverse place in late 1600s)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(york, was unique) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(new york, was unique)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(york, was unique) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(new york, was such diverse place in late 1600s)