zoo: be bad animals live in

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents attraction
Weight: 0.64
, facility
Weight: 0.63
, institution
Weight: 0.59
, thing
Weight: 0.59
Siblings african elephant
Weight: 0.53
, meerkat
Weight: 0.43
, aquarium
Weight: 0.35
, museum
Weight: 0.35
, amusement park
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be bad animals live in 1.00
be bad animals live 1.00
be bad to animals 0.95
be bad for animals 0.95
be good for animals 0.93
be good places for animals 0.89
be bad for animals health 0.89
be bad for endangered animals 0.89
be important for animals 0.88
affect animals 0.88

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(zoo, be bad animals live in)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(aquarium, be bad for animals)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(zoo, be bad animals live in)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(aquarium, be good for animals)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(zoo, be bad animals live in)
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(aquarium, be good for animals)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(aquarium, be good for animals)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(zoo, be bad animals live in)
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(aquarium, be bad for animals)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(aquarium, be bad for animals)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(zoo, be bad animals live in)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(zoo, be bad animals live in)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(zoo, be bad animals live in)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(zoo, be bad to animals)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(zoo, be bad animals live in)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(zoo, be bad for animals)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(zoo, be bad animals live in)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(zoo, be bad for animals)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(zoo, be bad animals live in)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(zoo, affect animals)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(zoo, be bad animals live in)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(zoo, be good for animals)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(zoo, be bad animals live in)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(zoo, be good places for animals)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(zoo, be bad animals live in)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(zoo, be important for animals)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(zoo, be bad animals live in)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(zoo, affect animals)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(zoo, be bad animals live in)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(zoo, be bad for animals)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(zoo, be bad animals live in)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(zoo, be bad to animals)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(zoo, be bad animals live in)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(zoo, be bad for animals)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(zoo, be bad animals live in)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(zoo, be bad for animals)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(zoo, be bad animals live in)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(zoo, be bad to animals)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(zoo, be bad animals live in)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(zoo, be bad for animals)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(zoo, be bad animals live in)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(zoo, be good for animals)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(zoo, be bad animals live in)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(zoo, be good places for animals)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(zoo, be bad animals live in)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(zoo, be important for animals)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(zoo, be bad animals live in)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(zoo, affect animals)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(zoo, be bad animals live in)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(zoo, be good for animals)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(zoo, be bad animals live in)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(zoo, be bad for animals)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(zoo, be bad animals live in)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(zoo, be bad to animals)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(zoo, be bad animals live in)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(zoo, be bad for animals)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(zoo, be bad animals live in)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(zoo, be good places for animals)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(zoo, be bad animals live in)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(zoo, be important for animals)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(zoo, be bad animals live in)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(zoo, be good for animals)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(zoo, be bad animals live in)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(zoo, be important for animals)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(zoo, be bad animals live in)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(zoo, be good places for animals)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(zoo, be bad animals live in)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(zoo, affect animals)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(zoo, be bad animals live in)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(zoo, be bad animals live in)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(zoo, be bad animals live in)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(zoo, be bad animals live in)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(zoo, be bad animals live in)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(zoo, be bad animals live in)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(aquarium, be good for animals)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(zoo, be bad animals live in)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(aquarium, be bad for animals)