zoo: be bad to animals

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents attraction
Weight: 0.64
, facility
Weight: 0.63
, institution
Weight: 0.59
, thing
Weight: 0.59
Siblings african elephant
Weight: 0.53
, meerkat
Weight: 0.43
, aquarium
Weight: 0.35
, museum
Weight: 0.35
, amusement park
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be bad to animals 1.00
be bad for animals 0.99
be good for animals 0.95
be bad animals live 0.95
be bad animals live in 0.95
be bad for animals health 0.92
be bad for endangered animals 0.91
be important for animals 0.91
affect animals 0.90
be good places for animals 0.89

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(zoo, be bad to animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(aquarium, be bad for animals)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(zoo, be bad to animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(aquarium, be good for animals)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(zoo, be bad to animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(aquarium, be bad for animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(aquarium, be bad for animals)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(zoo, be bad to animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(aquarium, be good for animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(aquarium, be good for animals)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(zoo, be bad to animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(zoo, be bad to animals)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(zoo, be bad to animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(zoo, affect animals)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(zoo, be bad to animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(zoo, be bad for animals)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(zoo, be bad to animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(zoo, be bad for animals)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(zoo, be bad to animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(zoo, be good for animals)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(zoo, be bad to animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(zoo, be bad animals live in)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(zoo, be bad to animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(zoo, be good places for animals)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(zoo, be bad to animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(zoo, be important for animals)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(zoo, be bad to animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(zoo, be bad for animals)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(zoo, be bad to animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(zoo, be bad for animals)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(zoo, be bad to animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(zoo, be bad for animals)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(zoo, be bad to animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(zoo, be bad for animals)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(zoo, be bad to animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(zoo, affect animals)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(zoo, be bad to animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(zoo, be good for animals)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(zoo, be bad to animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(zoo, be bad animals live in)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(zoo, be bad to animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(zoo, be bad animals live in)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(zoo, be bad to animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(zoo, be bad for animals)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(zoo, be bad to animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(zoo, be bad animals live in)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(zoo, be bad to animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(zoo, be bad for animals)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(zoo, be bad to animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(zoo, be good places for animals)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(zoo, be bad to animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(zoo, be good for animals)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(zoo, be bad to animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(zoo, affect animals)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(zoo, be bad to animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(zoo, be important for animals)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(zoo, be bad to animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(zoo, be important for animals)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(zoo, be bad to animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(zoo, be good places for animals)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(zoo, be bad to animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(zoo, be good for animals)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(zoo, be bad to animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(zoo, be important for animals)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(zoo, be bad to animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(zoo, be good places for animals)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(zoo, be bad to animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(zoo, affect animals)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(zoo, be bad to animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(zoo, be bad to animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(zoo, be bad to animals)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(zoo, be bad to animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(zoo, be bad to animals)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(zoo, be bad to animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(aquarium, be good for animals)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(zoo, be bad to animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(aquarium, be bad for animals)