abrasion: has quality bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents trauma
Weight: 0.60
, injury
Weight: 0.60
, effect
Weight: 0.54
, chemical
Weight: 0.54
, problem
Weight: 0.53
Siblings scratch
Weight: 0.56
, callus
Weight: 0.42
, laceration
Weight: 0.35
, fracture
Weight: 0.34
, whiplash
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality bad 1.00
has quality good 0.96
is bad 0.87
has quality worse 0.87
has quality change 0.86
has quality worth 0.82
hurt bad 0.77
feel good 0.76
has quality definition 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.56
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(effect, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(abrasion, has quality bad)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(injury, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(abrasion, has quality bad)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(effect, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(abrasion, has quality bad)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(effect, is bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(abrasion, has quality bad)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(chemical, has quality change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(abrasion, has quality bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(abrasion, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(effect, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(abrasion, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(injury, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(abrasion, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(chemical, has quality change)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(abrasion, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(effect, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(abrasion, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(effect, is bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(abrasion, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(effect, has quality bad)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(abrasion, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(effect, is bad)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(abrasion, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(injury, has quality bad)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(abrasion, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(chemical, has quality change)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(abrasion, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(effect, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(abrasion, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(whiplash, has quality good)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(abrasion, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(whiplash, has quality worth)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(abrasion, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(scratch, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(abrasion, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(callus, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(abrasion, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(whiplash, has quality worse)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(abrasion, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(callus, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(abrasion, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(fracture, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(abrasion, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(callus, hurt bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(abrasion, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(scratch, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(abrasion, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(scratch, feel good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(effect, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(abrasion, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(abrasion, has quality bad)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(injury, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(abrasion, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(abrasion, has quality bad)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(effect, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(abrasion, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(abrasion, has quality bad)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(effect, is bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(abrasion, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(abrasion, has quality bad)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(chemical, has quality change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(abrasion, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(abrasion, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(abrasion, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(whiplash, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(whiplash, has quality good)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(abrasion, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(fracture, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(fracture, has quality bad)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(abrasion, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(scratch, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(scratch, has quality bad)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(abrasion, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(scratch, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(scratch, has quality good)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(abrasion, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(callus, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(callus, has quality bad)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(abrasion, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(callus, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(callus, has quality good)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(abrasion, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(whiplash, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(whiplash, has quality worth)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(abrasion, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(whiplash, has quality worse) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(whiplash, has quality worse)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(abrasion, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(scratch, feel good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(scratch, feel good)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(abrasion, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(callus, hurt bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(callus, hurt bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(abrasion, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(abrasion, has quality bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(abrasion, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(abrasion, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(abrasion, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(abrasion, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(abrasion, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(abrasion, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(chemical, has quality change)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(abrasion, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(injury, has quality bad)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(abrasion, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(effect, has quality bad)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(abrasion, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(effect, has quality good)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(abrasion, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(effect, is bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(abrasion, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(whiplash, has quality good)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(abrasion, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(whiplash, has quality worth)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(abrasion, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(scratch, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(abrasion, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(whiplash, has quality worse)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(abrasion, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(fracture, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(abrasion, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(callus, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(abrasion, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(scratch, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(abrasion, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(callus, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(abrasion, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(scratch, feel good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(abrasion, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(callus, hurt bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(abrasion, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(injury, has quality bad)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(abrasion, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(effect, has quality bad)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(abrasion, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(effect, has quality good)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(abrasion, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(chemical, has quality change)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(abrasion, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(effect, is bad)