acrylic: has quality resource

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents polymer
Weight: 0.69
, resin
Weight: 0.67
, plastic
Weight: 0.66
, option
Weight: 0.56
, material
Weight: 0.56
Siblings silicone
Weight: 0.36
, polyethylene
Weight: 0.36
, fiberglass
Weight: 0.35
, pvc
Weight: 0.35
, aluminum foil
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality resource 1.00
is non resource 0.88
is renewable resource 0.83
is non renewable resource 0.82
has quality good 0.79
has quality bad 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.37
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(plastic, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(acrylic, has quality resource)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(plastic, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(acrylic, has quality resource)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(acrylic, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(plastic, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(acrylic, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(plastic, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(acrylic, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(plastic, has quality good)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(acrylic, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(plastic, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(acrylic, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(silicone, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(acrylic, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(polyethylene, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(acrylic, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(aluminum foil, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(acrylic, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(fiberglass, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(acrylic, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(pvc, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(acrylic, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(pvc, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(plastic, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(acrylic, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(acrylic, has quality resource)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(plastic, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(acrylic, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(acrylic, has quality resource)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(acrylic, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(pvc, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(pvc, has quality good)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(acrylic, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(silicone, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(silicone, has quality bad)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(acrylic, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(polyethylene, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(polyethylene, has quality bad)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(acrylic, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(fiberglass, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(fiberglass, has quality good)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(acrylic, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(pvc, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(pvc, has quality bad)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(acrylic, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(aluminum foil, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(aluminum foil, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(acrylic, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(acrylic, has quality resource)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(acrylic, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(acrylic, is renewable resource)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(acrylic, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(acrylic, is renewable resource)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(acrylic, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(acrylic, is non renewable resource)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(acrylic, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(acrylic, is non renewable resource)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(acrylic, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(acrylic, is non resource)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(acrylic, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(acrylic, is non renewable resource)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(acrylic, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(acrylic, is renewable resource)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(acrylic, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(acrylic, is non renewable resource)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(acrylic, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(acrylic, is renewable resource)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(acrylic, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(acrylic, is non resource)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(acrylic, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(acrylic, is non resource)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(acrylic, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(acrylic, is non resource)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(acrylic, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(acrylic, has quality bad)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(acrylic, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(acrylic, has quality bad)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(acrylic, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(acrylic, has quality good)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(acrylic, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(acrylic, has quality good)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(acrylic, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(acrylic, has quality good)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(acrylic, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(acrylic, has quality bad)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(acrylic, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(acrylic, has quality bad)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(acrylic, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(acrylic, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(acrylic, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(acrylic, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(acrylic, has quality resource)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(acrylic, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(acrylic, has quality resource)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(acrylic, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(plastic, has quality good)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(acrylic, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(plastic, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(acrylic, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(polyethylene, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(acrylic, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(silicone, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(acrylic, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(pvc, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(acrylic, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(pvc, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(acrylic, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(fiberglass, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(acrylic, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(aluminum foil, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(acrylic, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(plastic, has quality good)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(acrylic, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(plastic, has quality bad)