acrylic: has quality bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents polymer
Weight: 0.69
, resin
Weight: 0.67
, plastic
Weight: 0.66
, option
Weight: 0.56
, material
Weight: 0.56
Siblings silicone
Weight: 0.36
, polyethylene
Weight: 0.36
, fiberglass
Weight: 0.35
, pvc
Weight: 0.35
, aluminum foil
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality bad 1.00
has quality good 0.96
be bad for environment 0.80
has quality resource 0.76
be good making 0.76
be good for environment 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(plastic, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(acrylic, has quality bad)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(plastic, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(acrylic, has quality bad)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(plastic, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(acrylic, has quality bad)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(polymer, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(acrylic, has quality bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(acrylic, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(polymer, be bad for environment)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(acrylic, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(plastic, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(acrylic, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(plastic, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(acrylic, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(plastic, be bad for environment)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.52
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(acrylic, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(plastic, has quality bad)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(acrylic, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(plastic, has quality good)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(acrylic, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(polymer, be bad for environment)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(acrylic, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(plastic, be bad for environment)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(acrylic, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(silicone, has quality bad)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(acrylic, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(polyethylene, has quality bad)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(acrylic, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(aluminum foil, has quality bad)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(acrylic, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(pvc, has quality bad)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(acrylic, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(fiberglass, has quality good)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(acrylic, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(polyethylene, be bad for environment)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(acrylic, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(silicone, be bad for environment)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(acrylic, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(pvc, has quality good)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(acrylic, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(fiberglass, be bad for environment)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(acrylic, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(aluminum foil, be bad for environment)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(plastic, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(acrylic, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(acrylic, has quality bad)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(plastic, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(acrylic, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(acrylic, has quality bad)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(plastic, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(acrylic, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(acrylic, has quality bad)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(polymer, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(acrylic, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(acrylic, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(acrylic, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(pvc, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(pvc, has quality good)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(acrylic, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(silicone, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(silicone, has quality bad)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(acrylic, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(polyethylene, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(polyethylene, has quality bad)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(acrylic, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(pvc, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(pvc, has quality bad)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(acrylic, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(aluminum foil, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(aluminum foil, has quality bad)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(acrylic, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(fiberglass, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(fiberglass, has quality good)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(acrylic, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(polyethylene, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(polyethylene, be bad for environment)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(acrylic, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(silicone, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(silicone, be bad for environment)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(acrylic, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(fiberglass, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(fiberglass, be bad for environment)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(acrylic, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(aluminum foil, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(aluminum foil, be bad for environment)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(acrylic, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(acrylic, has quality bad)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(acrylic, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(acrylic, has quality good)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(acrylic, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(acrylic, be bad for environment)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(acrylic, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(acrylic, has quality good)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(acrylic, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(acrylic, has quality good)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(acrylic, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(acrylic, has quality resource)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(acrylic, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(acrylic, be good for environment)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(acrylic, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(acrylic, be good making)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(acrylic, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(acrylic, be bad for environment)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(acrylic, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(acrylic, be bad for environment)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(acrylic, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(acrylic, be bad for environment)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(acrylic, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(acrylic, has quality good)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(acrylic, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(acrylic, has quality resource)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(acrylic, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(acrylic, be good for environment)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(acrylic, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(acrylic, be good making)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(acrylic, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(acrylic, has quality resource)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(acrylic, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(acrylic, has quality resource)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(acrylic, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(acrylic, be good making)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(acrylic, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(acrylic, be good for environment)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(acrylic, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(acrylic, be good for environment)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(acrylic, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(acrylic, be good making)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(acrylic, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(acrylic, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(acrylic, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(acrylic, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(acrylic, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(acrylic, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(plastic, has quality bad)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(acrylic, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(plastic, has quality good)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(acrylic, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(polymer, be bad for environment)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(acrylic, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(plastic, be bad for environment)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(acrylic, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(polyethylene, has quality bad)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(acrylic, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(silicone, has quality bad)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(acrylic, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(pvc, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(acrylic, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(aluminum foil, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(acrylic, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(pvc, has quality good)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(acrylic, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(fiberglass, has quality good)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(acrylic, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(polyethylene, be bad for environment)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(acrylic, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(silicone, be bad for environment)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(acrylic, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(fiberglass, be bad for environment)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(acrylic, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(aluminum foil, be bad for environment)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(acrylic, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(plastic, has quality bad)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(acrylic, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(plastic, has quality good)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(acrylic, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(polymer, be bad for environment)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(acrylic, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(plastic, be bad for environment)