actor: be in movie

Property	Similarity
be in movie	1.00
be important in movie	0.96
be used in film	0.91
be in movies	0.91
be in movie on television	0.89
get in movies	0.89
know movie quality from script	0.88
play at once in movie	0.88
know movie quality from just script	0.88
be in bad movies	0.88

0.73

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.07

Salient(actor, be in movie) ⋁

Evidence: 0.06

¬ Salient(actor, be in movies)

0.73

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.07

Plausible(actor, be in movie) ⋁

Evidence: 0.06

¬ Plausible(actor, be in movies)

0.73

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.08

Remarkable(actor, be in movie) ⋁

Evidence: 0.07

¬ Remarkable(actor, be in movies)

0.69

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.07

Salient(actor, be in movie) ⋁

Evidence: 0.09

¬ Salient(actor, get in movies)

0.69

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.08

Remarkable(actor, be in movie) ⋁

Evidence: 0.10

¬ Remarkable(actor, get in movies)

0.69

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.07

Plausible(actor, be in movie) ⋁

Evidence: 0.10

¬ Plausible(actor, get in movies)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.07

Plausible(actor, be in movie) ⋁

Evidence: 0.22

¬ Plausible(actor, be used in film)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.07

Salient(actor, be in movie) ⋁

Evidence: 0.22

¬ Salient(actor, be used in film)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.32

Typical(actor, be in movie) ⋁

Evidence: 0.32

¬ Typical(actor, be in movies)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.32

Typical(actor, be in movie) ⋁

Evidence: 0.35

¬ Typical(actor, be used in film)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.32

Typical(actor, be in movie) ⋁

Evidence: 0.38

¬ Typical(actor, get in movies)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.08

Remarkable(actor, be in movie) ⋁

Evidence: 0.33

¬ Remarkable(actor, be used in film)

0.53

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.08

Remarkable(actor, be in movie) ⋁

Evidence: 0.38

¬ Remarkable(actor, be important in movie)

0.30

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.32

Typical(actor, be in movie) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Typical(actor, be important in movie)

0.26

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.07

Salient(actor, be in movie) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Salient(actor, be important in movie)

0.21

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.07

Plausible(actor, be in movie) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Plausible(actor, be important in movie)

Parents	celebrity Weight: 0.66 , performer Weight: 0.64 , artist Weight: 0.63 , famous person Weight: 0.62
Siblings	politician Weight: 0.66 , film maker Weight: 0.64 , villain Weight: 0.61 , prosecutor Weight: 0.57 , ethel waters Weight: 0.56

actor: be in movie

Related concepts

Related properties

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

Salient implies Plausible

Similarity expansion

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

Typical implies Plausible

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings