actor: be used in film

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents celebrity
Weight: 0.66
, performer
Weight: 0.64
, artist
Weight: 0.63
, famous person
Weight: 0.62
Siblings politician
Weight: 0.66
, film maker
Weight: 0.64
, villain
Weight: 0.61
, prosecutor
Weight: 0.57
, ethel waters
Weight: 0.56

Related properties

Property Similarity
be used in film 1.00
be in movie 0.91
be important in movie 0.89
be in films 0.88
have sex on film 0.86
be used in horror movies 0.85
know movie quality from script 0.84
be in movie on television 0.84
be in movies 0.84
know movie quality from just script 0.84

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(actor, be used in film) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(villain, be in movies)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(actor, be used in film) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(villain, be in movies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(villain, be in movies)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(actor, be used in film) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(actor, be used in film)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(actor, be used in film) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(actor, be in movie)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.22
Salient(actor, be used in film) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(actor, be in movie)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(actor, be used in film) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(actor, be in movie)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(actor, be used in film) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(actor, be in movies)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.22
Salient(actor, be used in film) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(actor, be in movies)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(actor, be used in film) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(actor, be in movies)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(actor, be used in film) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(actor, have sex on film)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.22
Salient(actor, be used in film) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(actor, have sex on film)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(actor, be used in film) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(actor, have sex on film)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(actor, be used in film) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(actor, be in movie)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(actor, be used in film) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(actor, be important in movie)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(actor, be used in film) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(actor, be in movies)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(actor, be used in film) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(actor, have sex on film)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.22
Salient(actor, be used in film) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(actor, be important in movie)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(actor, be used in film) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(actor, be important in movie)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(actor, be used in film) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(actor, be important in movie)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Salient(actor, be used in film) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(actor, be used in film) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(actor, be used in film)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(actor, be used in film) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(actor, be used in film)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(actor, be used in film) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(villain, be in movies)