actor: have sex on film

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents celebrity
Weight: 0.66
, performer
Weight: 0.64
, artist
Weight: 0.63
, famous person
Weight: 0.62
Siblings politician
Weight: 0.66
, film maker
Weight: 0.64
, villain
Weight: 0.61
, prosecutor
Weight: 0.57
, ethel waters
Weight: 0.56

Related properties

Property Similarity
have sex on film 1.00
have sex in movies 0.94
do sex scenes in movies 0.89
act out sex scenes in movies 0.89
be used in film 0.86
be in movie 0.86
be important in movie 0.83
be in films 0.82
be in movie on television 0.81
be in movies 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(actor, have sex on film) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(villain, be in movies)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(actor, have sex on film) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(villain, be in movies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(villain, be in movies)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(actor, have sex on film) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(actor, have sex on film)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(actor, have sex on film) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(actor, have sex in movies)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(actor, have sex on film) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(actor, have sex in movies)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(actor, have sex on film) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(actor, have sex in movies)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(actor, have sex on film) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(actor, be in movie)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(actor, have sex on film) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(actor, be in movie)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(actor, have sex on film) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(actor, have sex on film) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(actor, have sex on film)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(actor, have sex on film) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(actor, have sex on film)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(actor, have sex on film) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(villain, be in movies)