actress: look good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents artist
Weight: 0.68
, star
Weight: 0.63
, celebrity
Weight: 0.61
, film
Weight: 0.61
Siblings actor
Weight: 0.38
, dancer
Weight: 0.36
, movie star
Weight: 0.36
, singer
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
look good 1.00
look same 0.87
look young 0.84
look better in movies 0.83
look white 0.82
is pretty 0.75
get in good movies 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(star, look white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(actress, look good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(actress, look good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(star, look white)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(actress, look good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(star, look white)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(actress, look good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(actor, look better in movies)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(actress, look good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(actor, look young)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(actress, look good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(movie star, look good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(actress, look good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(movie star, look young)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(star, look white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(actress, look good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(actress, look good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(actress, look good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(movie star, look good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(movie star, look good)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(actress, look good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(actor, look better in movies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(actor, look better in movies)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(actress, look good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(movie star, look young) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(movie star, look young)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(actress, look good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(actor, look young) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(actor, look young)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(actress, look good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(actress, look good)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(actress, look good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(actress, look same)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(actress, look good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(actress, look better in movies)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(actress, look good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(actress, look better in movies)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(actress, look good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(actress, look better in movies)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(actress, look good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(actress, look same)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(actress, look good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(actress, look good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(actress, look good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(actress, look good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(actress, look good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(actress, look good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(star, look white)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(actress, look good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(actor, look better in movies)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(actress, look good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(movie star, look good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(actress, look good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(movie star, look young)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(actress, look good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(actor, look young)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(actress, look good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(star, look white)