advertising: be for business

Related concepts

Parents	industry Weight: 0.64 , business activity Weight: 0.62 , investment Weight: 0.60 , content Weight: 0.59
Siblings	advertising agency Weight: 0.71 , revenue Weight: 0.34 , banking industry Weight: 0.34 , automobile industry Weight: 0.33 , internet service provider Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property	Similarity
be for business	1.00
be business	0.98
be important for business	0.95
be important in business	0.93
be important to business	0.93
remain business	0.84
be profitable for companies	0.81
remain viable business	0.79
be lucrative business	0.79
be important to company	0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.33

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.31

Plausible(investment, be important for business) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Typical(advertising, be for business)

0.30

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.25

Plausible(investment, be important to business) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Typical(advertising, be for business)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.69

Plausible(advertising, be for business) ⋁

Evidence: 0.25

¬ Plausible(investment, be important to business)

0.08

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.69

Plausible(advertising, be for business) ⋁

Evidence: 0.31

¬ Plausible(investment, be important for business)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.16

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Remarkable(advertising, be for business) ⋁

Evidence: 0.98

¬ Remarkable(investment, be important for business)

0.15

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Remarkable(advertising, be for business) ⋁

Evidence: 0.99

¬ Remarkable(investment, be important to business)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Remarkable(advertising, be for business) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Remarkable(revenue, be important in business)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Remarkable(advertising, be for business) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Remarkable(revenue, be important to business)

0.04

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Remarkable(advertising, be for business) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Remarkable(revenue, be important to company)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.31

Plausible(investment, be important for business) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

Remarkable(advertising, be for business) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Plausible(advertising, be for business)

0.33

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.25

Plausible(investment, be important to business) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

Remarkable(advertising, be for business) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Plausible(advertising, be for business)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.69

Plausible(advertising, be for business) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

Remarkable(revenue, be important to business) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Plausible(revenue, be important to business)

0.53

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.69

Plausible(advertising, be for business) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

Remarkable(revenue, be important in business) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Plausible(revenue, be important in business)

0.45

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.69

Plausible(advertising, be for business) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

Remarkable(revenue, be important to company) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Plausible(revenue, be important to company)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.69

Plausible(advertising, be for business) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Salient(advertising, be for business)

Similarity expansion

0.72

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.98

Evidence: 0.81

Salient(advertising, be for business) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Salient(advertising, be business)

0.70

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.98

Evidence: 0.69

Typical(advertising, be for business) ⋁

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Typical(advertising, be business)

0.69

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.98

Evidence: 0.69

Plausible(advertising, be for business) ⋁

Evidence: 0.57

¬ Plausible(advertising, be business)

0.67

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.81

Salient(advertising, be for business) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Salient(advertising, be important to business)

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.69

Typical(advertising, be for business) ⋁

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Typical(advertising, be important to business)

...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.81

Salient(advertising, be for business) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Typical(advertising, be for business) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Remarkable(advertising, be for business)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.69

Plausible(advertising, be for business) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Typical(advertising, be for business)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.46

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Remarkable(advertising, be for business) ⋁

Evidence: 0.04

¬ Typical(investment, be important to business)

0.46

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Remarkable(advertising, be for business) ⋁

Evidence: 0.08

¬ Typical(investment, be important for business)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Remarkable(advertising, be for business) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Typical(revenue, be important to business)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Remarkable(advertising, be for business) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Typical(revenue, be important in business)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Remarkable(advertising, be for business) ⋁

Evidence: 0.58

¬ Typical(revenue, be important to company)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.45

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.69

Typical(advertising, be for business) ⋁

Evidence: 0.08

¬ Typical(investment, be important for business)

0.44

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.69

Typical(advertising, be for business) ⋁

Evidence: 0.04

¬ Typical(investment, be important to business)