agriculture: be considered science

Related concepts

Parents	science Weight: 0.66 , sector Weight: 0.64 , department Weight: 0.64 , ministry Weight: 0.63 , issue Weight: 0.63
Siblings	computer science Weight: 0.35 , automobile industry Weight: 0.35 , ecology Weight: 0.34 , textile Weight: 0.34 , education Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property	Similarity
be considered science	1.00
be called science	0.93
be related to science	0.90
be related to biology	0.80
be considered art	0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.42

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.47

Plausible(science, be related to science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.57

¬ Typical(agriculture, be considered science)

0.40

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.38

Plausible(science, be called science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.57

¬ Typical(agriculture, be considered science)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.45

Plausible(agriculture, be considered science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.38

¬ Plausible(science, be called science)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.45

Plausible(agriculture, be considered science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.47

¬ Plausible(science, be related to science)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.32

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.41

¬ Remarkable(agriculture, be considered science) ⋁

Evidence: 1.00

¬ Remarkable(science, be called science)

0.31

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.41

¬ Remarkable(agriculture, be considered science) ⋁

Evidence: 1.00

¬ Remarkable(science, be related to science)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.41

¬ Remarkable(agriculture, be considered science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Remarkable(ecology, be considered science)

0.08

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.41

¬ Remarkable(agriculture, be considered science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.98

¬ Remarkable(computer science, be considered science)

0.08

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.41

¬ Remarkable(agriculture, be considered science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Remarkable(ecology, be related to science)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.38

Plausible(science, be called science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.41

Remarkable(agriculture, be considered science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.45

¬ Plausible(agriculture, be considered science)

0.32

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.47

Plausible(science, be related to science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.41

Remarkable(agriculture, be considered science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.45

¬ Plausible(agriculture, be considered science)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.60

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.45

Plausible(agriculture, be considered science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.98

Remarkable(computer science, be considered science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.23

¬ Plausible(computer science, be considered science)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.45

Plausible(agriculture, be considered science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

Remarkable(ecology, be considered science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.50

¬ Plausible(ecology, be considered science)

0.50

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.45

Plausible(agriculture, be considered science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

Remarkable(ecology, be related to science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Plausible(ecology, be related to science)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.45

Plausible(agriculture, be considered science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.38

¬ Salient(agriculture, be considered science)

Similarity expansion

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.38

Salient(agriculture, be considered science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.29

¬ Salient(agriculture, be called science)

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.45

Plausible(agriculture, be considered science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.34

¬ Plausible(agriculture, be called science)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.57

Typical(agriculture, be considered science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.47

¬ Typical(agriculture, be called science)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.41

Remarkable(agriculture, be considered science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.35

¬ Remarkable(agriculture, be called science)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.57

Typical(agriculture, be considered science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.22

¬ Typical(agriculture, be considered art)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.45

Plausible(agriculture, be considered science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.30

¬ Plausible(agriculture, be considered art)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.41

Remarkable(agriculture, be considered science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.34

¬ Remarkable(agriculture, be related to biology)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.38

Salient(agriculture, be considered science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.34

¬ Salient(agriculture, be related to biology)

0.52

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.45

Plausible(agriculture, be considered science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.43

¬ Plausible(agriculture, be related to biology)

0.52

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.38

Salient(agriculture, be considered science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.37

¬ Salient(agriculture, be considered art)

0.51

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.57

Typical(agriculture, be considered science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Typical(agriculture, be related to biology)

0.49

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.57

Typical(agriculture, be considered science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Typical(agriculture, be related to science)

0.48

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.41

Remarkable(agriculture, be considered science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Remarkable(agriculture, be related to science)

0.44

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.45

Plausible(agriculture, be considered science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Plausible(agriculture, be related to science)

0.37

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.41

Remarkable(agriculture, be considered science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Remarkable(agriculture, be considered art)

0.37

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.38

Salient(agriculture, be considered science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Salient(agriculture, be related to science)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.38

Salient(agriculture, be considered science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.57

¬ Typical(agriculture, be considered science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.41

¬ Remarkable(agriculture, be considered science)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.45

Plausible(agriculture, be considered science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.57

¬ Typical(agriculture, be considered science)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.46

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.41

¬ Remarkable(agriculture, be considered science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.11

¬ Typical(science, be called science)

0.42

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.41

¬ Remarkable(agriculture, be considered science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.22

¬ Typical(science, be related to science)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.41

¬ Remarkable(agriculture, be considered science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.03

¬ Typical(computer science, be considered science)

0.12

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.41

¬ Remarkable(agriculture, be considered science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.35

¬ Typical(ecology, be considered science)

0.09

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.41

¬ Remarkable(agriculture, be considered science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Typical(ecology, be related to science)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.43

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.57

Typical(agriculture, be considered science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.11

¬ Typical(science, be called science)

0.39

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.57

Typical(agriculture, be considered science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.22

¬ Typical(science, be related to science)