# algebra: was developed

from Quasimodo

## Related concepts

 Parents courseWeight: 0.59, classWeight: 0.58, thingWeight: 0.56, high schoolWeight: 0.56, studyWeight: 0.56 Siblings linear algebraWeight: 0.64, quaternionWeight: 0.39, calculusWeight: 0.34, school districtWeight: 0.34

## Related properties

 Similarity Property was developed 1.00 was created 0.83 was invented 0.81 is invented 0.77 was discovered 0.76

## Clauses

### Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(algebra, was developed)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(calculus, was invented)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(algebra, was developed)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(calculus, is invented)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.13
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(algebra, was developed)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(calculus, was developed)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.14
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(algebra, was developed)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(calculus, was created)

### Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(algebra, was developed)
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(calculus, was developed)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(calculus, was developed)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(algebra, was developed)
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(calculus, was created)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(calculus, was created)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(algebra, was developed)
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(calculus, was invented)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(calculus, was invented)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(algebra, was developed)
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(calculus, is invented)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(calculus, is invented)

### Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(algebra, was developed)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(algebra, was developed)

### Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(algebra, was developed)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(algebra, was created)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(algebra, was developed)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(algebra, was invented)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(algebra, was developed)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(algebra, was discovered)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(algebra, was developed)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(algebra, was created)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(algebra, was developed)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(algebra, was invented)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(algebra, was developed)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(algebra, was discovered)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(algebra, was developed)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(algebra, was created)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(algebra, was developed)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(algebra, was created)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(algebra, was developed)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(algebra, was discovered)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(algebra, was developed)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(algebra, was invented)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(algebra, was developed)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(algebra, was discovered)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(algebra, was developed)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(algebra, was invented)

### Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(algebra, was developed)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(algebra, was developed)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(algebra, was developed)

### Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(algebra, was developed)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(algebra, was developed)

### Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(algebra, was developed)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(calculus, was developed)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(algebra, was developed)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(calculus, was created)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(algebra, was developed)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(calculus, was invented)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(algebra, was developed)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(calculus, is invented)