algebra: was developed

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents course
Weight: 0.59
, class
Weight: 0.58
, thing
Weight: 0.56
, high school
Weight: 0.56
, study
Weight: 0.56
Siblings linear algebra
Weight: 0.64
, quaternion
Weight: 0.39
, calculus
Weight: 0.34
, school district
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
was developed 1.00
was created 0.83
was invented 0.81
is invented 0.77
was discovered 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(algebra, was developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(calculus, was invented)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(algebra, was developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(calculus, is invented)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.13
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(algebra, was developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(calculus, was developed)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.14
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(algebra, was developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(calculus, was created)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(algebra, was developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(calculus, was developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(calculus, was developed)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(algebra, was developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(calculus, was created) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(calculus, was created)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(algebra, was developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(calculus, was invented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(calculus, was invented)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(algebra, was developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(calculus, is invented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(calculus, is invented)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(algebra, was developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(algebra, was developed)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(algebra, was developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(algebra, was created)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(algebra, was developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(algebra, was invented)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(algebra, was developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(algebra, was discovered)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(algebra, was developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(algebra, was created)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(algebra, was developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(algebra, was invented)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(algebra, was developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(algebra, was discovered)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(algebra, was developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(algebra, was created)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(algebra, was developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(algebra, was created)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(algebra, was developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(algebra, was discovered)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(algebra, was developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(algebra, was invented)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(algebra, was developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(algebra, was discovered)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(algebra, was developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(algebra, was invented)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(algebra, was developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(algebra, was developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(algebra, was developed)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(algebra, was developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(algebra, was developed)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(algebra, was developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(calculus, was developed)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(algebra, was developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(calculus, was created)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(algebra, was developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(calculus, was invented)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(algebra, was developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(calculus, is invented)