calculus: was developed

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents math
Weight: 0.61
, topic
Weight: 0.60
, thing
Weight: 0.59
, course
Weight: 0.59
, subject
Weight: 0.58
Siblings mathematics
Weight: 0.35
, algebra
Weight: 0.34
, arithmetic
Weight: 0.33
, boolean algebra
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
was developed 1.00
was created 0.83
was invented 0.81
is invented 0.77
be used in development 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(calculus, was developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(algebra, was invented)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(calculus, was developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(algebra, was created)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.13
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(calculus, was developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(algebra, was developed)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(calculus, was developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(algebra, was developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(algebra, was developed)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(calculus, was developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(algebra, was created) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(algebra, was created)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(calculus, was developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(algebra, was invented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(algebra, was invented)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(calculus, was developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(calculus, was developed)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(calculus, was developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(calculus, was created)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(calculus, was developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(calculus, was invented)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(calculus, was developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(calculus, is invented)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(calculus, was developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(calculus, was created)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(calculus, was developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(calculus, was created)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(calculus, was developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(calculus, was created)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(calculus, was developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(calculus, was invented)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(calculus, was developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(calculus, is invented)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(calculus, was developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(calculus, was invented)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(calculus, was developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(calculus, is invented)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(calculus, was developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(calculus, was invented)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(calculus, was developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(calculus, is invented)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(calculus, was developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(calculus, was developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(calculus, was developed)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(calculus, was developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(calculus, was developed)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(calculus, was developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(algebra, was developed)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(calculus, was developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(algebra, was created)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.17
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(calculus, was developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(algebra, was invented)