calculus: was invented

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents math
Weight: 0.61
, topic
Weight: 0.60
, thing
Weight: 0.59
, course
Weight: 0.59
, subject
Weight: 0.58
Siblings mathematics
Weight: 0.35
, algebra
Weight: 0.34
, arithmetic
Weight: 0.33
, boolean algebra
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
was invented 1.00
is invented 0.98
was developed 0.81
was created 0.79
was used then 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(calculus, was invented)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(algebra, was invented)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(calculus, was invented)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(algebra, was created)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(calculus, was invented)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(algebra, was developed)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(calculus, was invented)
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(algebra, was invented)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(algebra, was invented)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(calculus, was invented)
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(algebra, was developed)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(algebra, was developed)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(calculus, was invented)
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(algebra, was created)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(algebra, was created)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(calculus, was invented)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(calculus, was invented)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(calculus, was invented)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(calculus, is invented)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(calculus, was invented)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(calculus, is invented)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(calculus, was invented)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(calculus, is invented)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(calculus, was invented)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(calculus, was developed)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(calculus, was invented)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(calculus, is invented)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(calculus, was invented)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(calculus, was developed)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(calculus, was invented)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(calculus, was created)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(calculus, was invented)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(calculus, was developed)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(calculus, was invented)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(calculus, was created)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(calculus, was invented)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(calculus, was created)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(calculus, was invented)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(calculus, was developed)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(calculus, was invented)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(calculus, was created)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(calculus, was invented)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(calculus, was invented)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(calculus, was invented)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(calculus, was invented)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(calculus, was invented)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(calculus, was invented)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(algebra, was developed)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(calculus, was invented)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(algebra, was created)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(calculus, was invented)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(algebra, was invented)