calculus: is invented

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents math
Weight: 0.61
, topic
Weight: 0.60
, thing
Weight: 0.59
, course
Weight: 0.59
, subject
Weight: 0.58
Siblings mathematics
Weight: 0.35
, algebra
Weight: 0.34
, arithmetic
Weight: 0.33
, boolean algebra
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
is invented 1.00
was invented 0.98
was developed 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(calculus, is invented)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(algebra, was invented)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(calculus, is invented)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(algebra, was developed)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(calculus, is invented)
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(algebra, was invented)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(algebra, was invented)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(calculus, is invented)
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(algebra, was developed)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(algebra, was developed)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(calculus, is invented)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(calculus, is invented)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(calculus, is invented)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(calculus, was invented)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(calculus, is invented)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(calculus, was invented)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(calculus, is invented)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(calculus, was invented)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(calculus, is invented)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(calculus, was invented)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(calculus, is invented)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(calculus, was developed)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(calculus, is invented)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(calculus, was developed)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(calculus, is invented)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(calculus, was developed)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(calculus, is invented)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(calculus, was developed)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(calculus, is invented)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(calculus, is invented)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(calculus, is invented)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(calculus, is invented)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(calculus, is invented)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(calculus, is invented)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(algebra, was developed)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(calculus, is invented)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(algebra, was invented)