analysis: be important in planning

Related concepts

Parents	factor Weight: 0.62 , risk Weight: 0.59 , journal Weight: 0.59 , projection Weight: 0.57
Siblings	cost benefit analysis Weight: 0.76 , report Weight: 0.67 , review Weight: 0.60 , insight Weight: 0.59 , reporting Weight: 0.57

Related properties

Property	Similarity
be important in planning	1.00
be important in strategic planning	0.92
be important in project management	0.78
be important in project management process	0.78
be important in marketing	0.77
be important for business	0.77
be important to management	0.77
be important in business	0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.44

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.86

Plausible(factor, be important in business) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Typical(analysis, be important in planning)

0.33

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.62

Plausible(risk, be important in project management) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Typical(analysis, be important in planning)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.90

Plausible(analysis, be important in planning) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Plausible(risk, be important in project management)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.90

Plausible(analysis, be important in planning) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Plausible(factor, be important in business)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.32

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Remarkable(analysis, be important in planning) ⋁

Evidence: 0.43

¬ Remarkable(risk, be important in project management)

0.25

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Remarkable(analysis, be important in planning) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Remarkable(factor, be important in business)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Remarkable(analysis, be important in planning) ⋁

Evidence: 0.44

¬ Remarkable(insight, be important in marketing)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Remarkable(analysis, be important in planning) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Remarkable(review, be important for business)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Remarkable(analysis, be important in planning) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Remarkable(report, be important in project management process)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Remarkable(analysis, be important in planning) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Remarkable(report, be important in business)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Remarkable(analysis, be important in planning) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Remarkable(report, be important to management)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.86

Plausible(factor, be important in business) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

Remarkable(analysis, be important in planning) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Plausible(analysis, be important in planning)

0.29

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.62

Plausible(risk, be important in project management) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

Remarkable(analysis, be important in planning) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Plausible(analysis, be important in planning)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.90

Plausible(analysis, be important in planning) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

Remarkable(report, be important in project management process) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Plausible(report, be important in project management process)

0.45

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.90

Plausible(analysis, be important in planning) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

Remarkable(report, be important to management) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Plausible(report, be important to management)

0.45

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.90

Plausible(analysis, be important in planning) ⋁

Evidence: 0.44

Remarkable(insight, be important in marketing) ⋁

Evidence: 0.48

¬ Plausible(insight, be important in marketing)

0.45

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.90

Plausible(analysis, be important in planning) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

Remarkable(report, be important in business) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Plausible(report, be important in business)

0.45

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.90

Plausible(analysis, be important in planning) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

Remarkable(review, be important for business) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Plausible(review, be important for business)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.90

Plausible(analysis, be important in planning) ⋁

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Salient(analysis, be important in planning)

Similarity expansion

0.76

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.96

Salient(analysis, be important in planning) ⋁

Evidence: 0.98

¬ Salient(analysis, be important in strategic planning)

0.74

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.93

Typical(analysis, be important in planning) ⋁

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Typical(analysis, be important in strategic planning)

0.71

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.90

Plausible(analysis, be important in planning) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Plausible(analysis, be important in strategic planning)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.96

Salient(analysis, be important in planning) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Salient(analysis, be important in business)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.66

Remarkable(analysis, be important in planning) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Remarkable(analysis, be important in strategic planning)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.93

Typical(analysis, be important in planning) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Typical(analysis, be important in business)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.90

Plausible(analysis, be important in planning) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Plausible(analysis, be important in business)

0.52

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.66

Remarkable(analysis, be important in planning) ⋁

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Remarkable(analysis, be important in business)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.96

Salient(analysis, be important in planning) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Typical(analysis, be important in planning) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Remarkable(analysis, be important in planning)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.90

Plausible(analysis, be important in planning) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Typical(analysis, be important in planning)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.20

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Remarkable(analysis, be important in planning) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Typical(risk, be important in project management)

0.16

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Remarkable(analysis, be important in planning) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Typical(factor, be important in business)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Remarkable(analysis, be important in planning) ⋁

Evidence: 0.57

¬ Typical(insight, be important in marketing)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Remarkable(analysis, be important in planning) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Typical(report, be important to management)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Remarkable(analysis, be important in planning) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Typical(report, be important in project management process)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Remarkable(analysis, be important in planning) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Typical(report, be important in business)

0.04

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Remarkable(analysis, be important in planning) ⋁

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Typical(review, be important for business)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.93

Typical(analysis, be important in planning) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Typical(risk, be important in project management)

0.35

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.93

Typical(analysis, be important in planning) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Typical(factor, be important in business)