analysis: be important in strategic planning

Related concepts

Parents	factor Weight: 0.62 , risk Weight: 0.59 , journal Weight: 0.59 , projection Weight: 0.57
Siblings	cost benefit analysis Weight: 0.76 , report Weight: 0.67 , review Weight: 0.60 , insight Weight: 0.59 , reporting Weight: 0.57

Related properties

Property	Similarity
be important in strategic planning	1.00
be important in planning	0.92
be important in marketing	0.79
be important in project management	0.79
be important in business	0.78
be important to management	0.78
be important for business	0.78
be important in project management process	0.77
take important in leadership	0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.45

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.86

Plausible(factor, be important in business) ⋁

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Typical(analysis, be important in strategic planning)

0.33

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.62

Plausible(risk, be important in project management) ⋁

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Typical(analysis, be important in strategic planning)

0.12

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.22

Plausible(risk, take important in leadership) ⋁

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Typical(analysis, be important in strategic planning)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.93

Plausible(analysis, be important in strategic planning) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Plausible(risk, be important in project management)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.93

Plausible(analysis, be important in strategic planning) ⋁

Evidence: 0.22

¬ Plausible(risk, take important in leadership)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.93

Plausible(analysis, be important in strategic planning) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Plausible(factor, be important in business)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.33

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Remarkable(analysis, be important in strategic planning) ⋁

Evidence: 0.43

¬ Remarkable(risk, be important in project management)

0.27

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Remarkable(analysis, be important in strategic planning) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Remarkable(factor, be important in business)

0.24

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Remarkable(analysis, be important in strategic planning) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Remarkable(risk, take important in leadership)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Remarkable(analysis, be important in strategic planning) ⋁

Evidence: 0.44

¬ Remarkable(insight, be important in marketing)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Remarkable(analysis, be important in strategic planning) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Remarkable(review, be important for business)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Remarkable(analysis, be important in strategic planning) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Remarkable(report, be important in business)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Remarkable(analysis, be important in strategic planning) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Remarkable(report, be important in project management process)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Remarkable(analysis, be important in strategic planning) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Remarkable(report, be important to management)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.86

Plausible(factor, be important in business) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

Remarkable(analysis, be important in strategic planning) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Plausible(analysis, be important in strategic planning)

0.29

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.62

Plausible(risk, be important in project management) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

Remarkable(analysis, be important in strategic planning) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Plausible(analysis, be important in strategic planning)

0.23

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.22

Plausible(risk, take important in leadership) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

Remarkable(analysis, be important in strategic planning) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Plausible(analysis, be important in strategic planning)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.93

Plausible(analysis, be important in strategic planning) ⋁

Evidence: 0.44

Remarkable(insight, be important in marketing) ⋁

Evidence: 0.48

¬ Plausible(insight, be important in marketing)

0.46

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.93

Plausible(analysis, be important in strategic planning) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

Remarkable(report, be important to management) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Plausible(report, be important to management)

0.46

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.93

Plausible(analysis, be important in strategic planning) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

Remarkable(report, be important in business) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Plausible(report, be important in business)

0.46

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.93

Plausible(analysis, be important in strategic planning) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

Remarkable(report, be important in project management process) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Plausible(report, be important in project management process)

0.46

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.93

Plausible(analysis, be important in strategic planning) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

Remarkable(review, be important for business) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Plausible(review, be important for business)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.93

Plausible(analysis, be important in strategic planning) ⋁

Evidence: 0.98

¬ Salient(analysis, be important in strategic planning)

Similarity expansion

0.77

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.98

Salient(analysis, be important in strategic planning) ⋁

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Salient(analysis, be important in planning)

0.76

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.96

Typical(analysis, be important in strategic planning) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Typical(analysis, be important in planning)

0.74

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.93

Plausible(analysis, be important in strategic planning) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Plausible(analysis, be important in planning)

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.98

Salient(analysis, be important in strategic planning) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Salient(analysis, be important in business)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.96

Typical(analysis, be important in strategic planning) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Typical(analysis, be important in business)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.93

Plausible(analysis, be important in strategic planning) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Plausible(analysis, be important in business)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.63

Remarkable(analysis, be important in strategic planning) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Remarkable(analysis, be important in planning)

0.52

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.63

Remarkable(analysis, be important in strategic planning) ⋁

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Remarkable(analysis, be important in business)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.98

Salient(analysis, be important in strategic planning) ⋁

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Typical(analysis, be important in strategic planning) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Remarkable(analysis, be important in strategic planning)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.93

Plausible(analysis, be important in strategic planning) ⋁

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Typical(analysis, be important in strategic planning)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.35

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Remarkable(analysis, be important in strategic planning) ⋁

Evidence: 0.14

¬ Typical(risk, take important in leadership)

0.22

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Remarkable(analysis, be important in strategic planning) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Typical(risk, be important in project management)

0.17

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Remarkable(analysis, be important in strategic planning) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Typical(factor, be important in business)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Remarkable(analysis, be important in strategic planning) ⋁

Evidence: 0.57

¬ Typical(insight, be important in marketing)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Remarkable(analysis, be important in strategic planning) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Typical(report, be important to management)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Remarkable(analysis, be important in strategic planning) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Typical(report, be important in project management process)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Remarkable(analysis, be important in strategic planning) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Typical(report, be important in business)

0.04

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Remarkable(analysis, be important in strategic planning) ⋁

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Typical(review, be important for business)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.96

Typical(analysis, be important in strategic planning) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Typical(risk, be important in project management)

0.37

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.96

Typical(analysis, be important in strategic planning) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Typical(factor, be important in business)

0.36

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.96

Typical(analysis, be important in strategic planning) ⋁

Evidence: 0.14

¬ Typical(risk, take important in leadership)