report: be important in project management process

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents analysis
Weight: 0.67
, evidence
Weight: 0.66
, study
Weight: 0.66
, policy
Weight: 0.65
Siblings article
Weight: 0.73
, opinion
Weight: 0.66
, publication
Weight: 0.65
, testimony
Weight: 0.63
, release
Weight: 0.63

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important in project management process 1.00
be important to management 0.85
be based management important 0.81
support process 0.80
be important in system 0.78
be important in planning 0.78
be important in strategic planning 0.77
be important for business 0.76
be important in work 0.76
be important in business 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(analysis, be important in strategic planning)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(report, be important in project management process)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(analysis, be important in planning)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(report, be important in project management process)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(analysis, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(report, be important in project management process)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(study, be important for business)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(report, be important in project management process)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(evidence, be based management important)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(report, be important in project management process)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(policy, be important in work)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(report, be important in project management process)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(report, be important in project management process)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(policy, be important in work)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(report, be important in project management process)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(evidence, be based management important)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(report, be important in project management process)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(analysis, be important in planning)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(report, be important in project management process)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(study, be important for business)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(report, be important in project management process)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(analysis, be important in strategic planning)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(report, be important in project management process)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(analysis, be important in business)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(report, be important in project management process)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(analysis, be important in business)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(report, be important in project management process)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(analysis, be important in strategic planning)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(report, be important in project management process)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(study, be important for business)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(report, be important in project management process)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(analysis, be important in planning)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(report, be important in project management process)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(evidence, be based management important)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(report, be important in project management process)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(policy, be important in work)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(report, be important in project management process)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(opinion, be important in system)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(evidence, be based management important)
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(report, be important in project management process)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(report, be important in project management process)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(analysis, be important in strategic planning)
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(report, be important in project management process)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(report, be important in project management process)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(analysis, be important in planning)
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(report, be important in project management process)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(report, be important in project management process)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(study, be important for business)
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(report, be important in project management process)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(report, be important in project management process)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(analysis, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(report, be important in project management process)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(report, be important in project management process)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(policy, be important in work)
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(report, be important in project management process)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(report, be important in project management process)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(report, be important in project management process)
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(opinion, be important in system)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(opinion, be important in system)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(report, be important in project management process)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(report, be important in project management process)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(report, be important in project management process)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(report, be important to management)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(report, be important in project management process)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(report, be important to management)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(report, be important in project management process)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(report, be important to management)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(report, be important in project management process)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(report, be important to management)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(report, be important in project management process)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(report, be important in business)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(report, be important in project management process)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(report, be important in business)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(report, be important in project management process)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(report, be important in business)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(report, be important in project management process)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(report, be important in business)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(report, be important in project management process)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(report, be important in project management process)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(report, be important in project management process)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(report, be important in project management process)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(report, be important in project management process)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(report, be important in project management process)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(policy, be important in work)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(report, be important in project management process)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(evidence, be based management important)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(report, be important in project management process)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(study, be important for business)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(report, be important in project management process)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(analysis, be important in planning)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(report, be important in project management process)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(analysis, be important in business)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(report, be important in project management process)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(analysis, be important in strategic planning)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(report, be important in project management process)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(opinion, be important in system)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(report, be important in project management process)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(policy, be important in work)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(report, be important in project management process)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(evidence, be based management important)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(report, be important in project management process)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(analysis, be important in planning)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(report, be important in project management process)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(study, be important for business)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(report, be important in project management process)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(analysis, be important in strategic planning)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(report, be important in project management process)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(analysis, be important in business)