apricot: be better than fresh

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents fruit
Weight: 0.65
, fruit tree
Weight: 0.65
, fresh fruit
Weight: 0.63
, crop
Weight: 0.61
, ingredient
Weight: 0.59
Siblings pear tree
Weight: 0.38
, pear
Weight: 0.38
, peach tree
Weight: 0.38
, apple tree
Weight: 0.38
, quince
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
be better than fresh 1.00
is fresh 0.90
be better than juice 0.82
be better than vegetables 0.80
be better than fruit 0.80
be healthier than juice 0.80
be better than apples 0.79
taste better than vegetables for humans 0.79
grow better than than mountain 0.79
be better than dried fruit 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(fruit, be better than dried fruit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(apricot, be better than fresh)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(crop, grow better than than mountain) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(apricot, be better than fresh)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(fresh fruit, be better than dried fruit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(apricot, be better than fresh)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(fruit, be better than juice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(apricot, be better than fresh)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(fresh fruit, be better than fruit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(apricot, be better than fresh)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(fruit, be healthier than juice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(apricot, be better than fresh)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(fruit, be better than vegetables) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(apricot, be better than fresh)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(fresh fruit, be better than juice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(apricot, be better than fresh)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(apricot, be better than fresh) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(fresh fruit, be better than juice)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(apricot, be better than fresh) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(fruit, be better than vegetables)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(apricot, be better than fresh) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(fruit, be healthier than juice)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(apricot, be better than fresh) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(fruit, be better than juice)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(apricot, be better than fresh) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(fresh fruit, be better than fruit)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(apricot, be better than fresh) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(fresh fruit, be better than dried fruit)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(apricot, be better than fresh) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(crop, grow better than than mountain)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(apricot, be better than fresh) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(fruit, be better than dried fruit)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(apricot, be better than fresh) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(fruit, be better than vegetables)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(apricot, be better than fresh) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(fresh fruit, be better than juice)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(apricot, be better than fresh) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(fruit, be healthier than juice)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(apricot, be better than fresh) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(fruit, be better than juice)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(apricot, be better than fresh) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(crop, grow better than than mountain)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(apricot, be better than fresh) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(fruit, be better than dried fruit)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(apricot, be better than fresh) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(fresh fruit, be better than fruit)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(apricot, be better than fresh) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(fresh fruit, be better than dried fruit)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(apricot, be better than fresh) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(pear, be better than apples)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(fruit, be better than dried fruit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(apricot, be better than fresh) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(apricot, be better than fresh)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(crop, grow better than than mountain) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(apricot, be better than fresh) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(apricot, be better than fresh)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(fruit, be better than juice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(apricot, be better than fresh) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(apricot, be better than fresh)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(fresh fruit, be better than dried fruit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(apricot, be better than fresh) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(apricot, be better than fresh)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(fresh fruit, be better than fruit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(apricot, be better than fresh) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(apricot, be better than fresh)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(fruit, be healthier than juice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(apricot, be better than fresh) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(apricot, be better than fresh)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(fresh fruit, be better than juice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(apricot, be better than fresh) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(apricot, be better than fresh)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(fruit, be better than vegetables) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(apricot, be better than fresh) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(apricot, be better than fresh)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(apricot, be better than fresh) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(pear, be better than apples) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(pear, be better than apples)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(apricot, be better than fresh) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(apricot, be better than fresh)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(apricot, be better than fresh) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(apricot, be better than fresh) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(apricot, be better than fresh)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(apricot, be better than fresh) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(apricot, be better than fresh)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(apricot, be better than fresh) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(fresh fruit, be better than fruit)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(apricot, be better than fresh) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(fresh fruit, be better than dried fruit)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(apricot, be better than fresh) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(fresh fruit, be better than juice)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(apricot, be better than fresh) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(fruit, be better than vegetables)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(apricot, be better than fresh) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(fruit, be healthier than juice)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(apricot, be better than fresh) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(fruit, be better than juice)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(apricot, be better than fresh) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(crop, grow better than than mountain)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(apricot, be better than fresh) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(fruit, be better than dried fruit)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(apricot, be better than fresh) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(pear, be better than apples)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(apricot, be better than fresh) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(fresh fruit, be better than fruit)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(apricot, be better than fresh) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(fresh fruit, be better than dried fruit)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(apricot, be better than fresh) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(fresh fruit, be better than juice)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(apricot, be better than fresh) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(fruit, be better than vegetables)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(apricot, be better than fresh) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(fruit, be healthier than juice)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(apricot, be better than fresh) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(fruit, be better than juice)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(apricot, be better than fresh) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(crop, grow better than than mountain)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(apricot, be better than fresh) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(fruit, be better than dried fruit)