apricot: has quality good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents fruit
Weight: 0.65
, fruit tree
Weight: 0.65
, fresh fruit
Weight: 0.63
, crop
Weight: 0.61
, ingredient
Weight: 0.59
Siblings pear tree
Weight: 0.38
, pear
Weight: 0.38
, peach tree
Weight: 0.38
, apple tree
Weight: 0.38
, quince
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality good 1.00
is quality 0.91
be good for 0.85
be good in water 0.80
be good for us 0.80
has quality resources 0.79
be good for people 0.79
taste good 0.79
has quality judaism 0.78
is really expensive 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.62
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(fruit, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(apricot, has quality good)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(fruit tree, has quality judaism) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(apricot, has quality good)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(fruit, be good in water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(apricot, has quality good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(apricot, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(fruit, be good in water)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(apricot, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(fruit tree, has quality judaism)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(apricot, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(fruit, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(apricot, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(fruit, be good in water)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(apricot, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(fruit tree, has quality judaism)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(apricot, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(fruit, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(apricot, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(pear, be good for us)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(fruit, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(apricot, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(apricot, has quality good)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(fruit, be good in water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(apricot, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(apricot, has quality good)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(fruit tree, has quality judaism) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(apricot, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(apricot, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(apricot, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(pear, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(pear, be good for us)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(apricot, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(apricot, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(apricot, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(apricot, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(apricot, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(apricot, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(apricot, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(apricot, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(fruit, be good in water)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(apricot, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(fruit tree, has quality judaism)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(apricot, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(fruit, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(apricot, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(pear, be good for us)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(apricot, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(fruit, has quality good)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(apricot, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(fruit, be good in water)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(apricot, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(fruit tree, has quality judaism)