archaeologist: study ancient garbage

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents scientist
Weight: 0.66
, expert
Weight: 0.62
, researcher
Weight: 0.59
, scholar
Weight: 0.58
, writer
Weight: 0.54
Siblings archeologist
Weight: 0.38
, geologist
Weight: 0.37
, biologist
Weight: 0.36
, astronomer
Weight: 0.36
, geneticist
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
study ancient garbage 1.00
study ancient cultures 0.83
study ancient civilizations 0.82
study archaeological records 0.79
study 0.76
be important in study 0.76
be important in study of history 0.76
study civilizations 0.76
investigate ancient cultures 0.76
study soil 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(archaeologist, study ancient garbage) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(biologist, study)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(archaeologist, study ancient garbage) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(biologist, study) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(biologist, study)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(archaeologist, study ancient garbage) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(archaeologist, study ancient garbage)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(archaeologist, study ancient garbage) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(archaeologist, study archaeological records)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(archaeologist, study ancient garbage) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(archaeologist, study)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(archaeologist, study ancient garbage) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(archaeologist, study ancient cultures)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(archaeologist, study ancient garbage) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(archaeologist, study ancient civilizations)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(archaeologist, study ancient garbage) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(archaeologist, be important in study of history)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(archaeologist, study ancient garbage) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(archaeologist, study ancient garbage) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(archaeologist, study ancient garbage)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(archaeologist, study ancient garbage) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(archaeologist, study ancient garbage)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(archaeologist, study ancient garbage) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(biologist, study)