archaeologist: study archaeological records

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents scientist
Weight: 0.66
, expert
Weight: 0.62
, researcher
Weight: 0.59
, scholar
Weight: 0.58
, writer
Weight: 0.54
Siblings archeologist
Weight: 0.38
, geologist
Weight: 0.37
, biologist
Weight: 0.36
, astronomer
Weight: 0.36
, geneticist
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
study archaeological records 1.00
study achaeological records 0.87
study records 0.87
be important in study of history 0.79
study ancient garbage 0.79
study ancient civilizations 0.78
study ancient cultures 0.78
study 0.77
be important in study 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(archaeologist, study archaeological records) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(biologist, study)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(archaeologist, study archaeological records) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(biologist, study) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(biologist, study)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(archaeologist, study archaeological records) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(archaeologist, study archaeological records)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(archaeologist, study archaeological records) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(archaeologist, study achaeological records)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(archaeologist, study archaeological records) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(archaeologist, study ancient garbage)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(archaeologist, study archaeological records) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(archaeologist, study achaeological records)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(archaeologist, study archaeological records) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(archaeologist, study ancient civilizations)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(archaeologist, study archaeological records) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(archaeologist, study ancient cultures)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(archaeologist, study archaeological records) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(archaeologist, study archaeological records) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(archaeologist, study archaeological records)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(archaeologist, study archaeological records) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(archaeologist, study archaeological records)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(archaeologist, study archaeological records) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(biologist, study)