area: have climates in summer

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents zone
Weight: 0.71
, region
Weight: 0.65
, route
Weight: 0.63
, landmark
Weight: 0.61
Siblings south carolina
Weight: 0.71
, national park
Weight: 0.70
, south dakota
Weight: 0.70
, north carolina
Weight: 0.69
, north dakota
Weight: 0.69

Related properties

Property Similarity
have climates in summer 1.00
have climates 0.95
be with climates 0.95
have different climates 0.93
have warmer climates 0.91
be with warmer climates 0.91
be with climates poorer 0.86
be with warmer climates poorer 0.85
be with warmer climates typically poorer 0.84
have milder climates 0.84

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(region, have warmer climates) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(area, have climates in summer)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(region, be with warmer climates typically poorer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(area, have climates in summer)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(area, have climates in summer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(region, have warmer climates)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(area, have climates in summer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(region, be with warmer climates typically poorer)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(area, have climates in summer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(region, have warmer climates)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(area, have climates in summer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(region, be with warmer climates typically poorer)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(region, have warmer climates) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(area, have climates in summer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(area, have climates in summer)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(region, be with warmer climates typically poorer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(area, have climates in summer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(area, have climates in summer)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(area, have climates in summer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(area, have climates in summer)

Similarity expansion

0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(area, have climates in summer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(area, have climates)
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(area, have climates in summer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(area, have climates)
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(area, have climates in summer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(area, have climates)
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(area, have climates in summer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(area, have different climates)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(area, have climates in summer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(area, have different climates)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(area, have climates in summer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(area, have different climates)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(area, have climates in summer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(area, have different climates)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(area, have climates in summer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(area, have climates)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(area, have climates in summer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(area, have climates in summer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(area, have climates in summer)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(area, have climates in summer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(area, have climates in summer)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(area, have climates in summer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(region, be with warmer climates typically poorer)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(area, have climates in summer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(region, have warmer climates)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(area, have climates in summer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(region, have warmer climates)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(area, have climates in summer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(region, be with warmer climates typically poorer)