area: have different climates

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents zone
Weight: 0.71
, region
Weight: 0.65
, route
Weight: 0.63
, landmark
Weight: 0.61
Siblings south carolina
Weight: 0.71
, national park
Weight: 0.70
, south dakota
Weight: 0.70
, north carolina
Weight: 0.69
, north dakota
Weight: 0.69

Related properties

Property Similarity
have different climates 1.00
have climates 0.98
be with climates 0.97
have climates in summer 0.93
have warmer climates 0.93
be with warmer climates 0.92
be with climates poorer 0.88
be with warmer climates poorer 0.87
be with climates typically poorer 0.86
be with warmer climates typically poorer 0.86

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.58
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(region, have warmer climates)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(area, have different climates)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(region, be with warmer climates typically poorer)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(area, have different climates)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(area, have different climates)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(region, be with warmer climates typically poorer)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(area, have different climates)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(region, have warmer climates)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.16
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(area, have different climates)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(region, have warmer climates)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(area, have different climates)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(region, be with warmer climates typically poorer)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(region, have warmer climates)
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(area, have different climates)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(area, have different climates)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(region, be with warmer climates typically poorer)
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(area, have different climates)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(area, have different climates)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(area, have different climates)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(area, have different climates)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.24
Typical(area, have different climates)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(area, have climates)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(area, have different climates)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(area, have climates)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(area, have different climates)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(area, have climates in summer)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(area, have different climates)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(area, have climates)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(area, have different climates)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(area, have climates)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(area, have different climates)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(area, have climates in summer)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(area, have different climates)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(area, have climates in summer)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.24
Typical(area, have different climates)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(area, have climates in summer)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(area, have different climates)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(area, have different climates)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(area, have different climates)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(area, have different climates)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(area, have different climates)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(area, have different climates)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(region, be with warmer climates typically poorer)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(area, have different climates)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(region, have warmer climates)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.24
Typical(area, have different climates)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(region, be with warmer climates typically poorer)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.24
Typical(area, have different climates)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(region, have warmer climates)