region: be with warmer climates typically poorer

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents country
Weight: 0.69
, factor
Weight: 0.60
, financial institution
Weight: 0.59
, province
Weight: 0.59
Siblings south carolina
Weight: 0.71
, east asia
Weight: 0.70
, north dakota
Weight: 0.67
, south
Weight: 0.65
, west
Weight: 0.65

Related properties

Property Similarity
be with warmer climates typically poorer 1.00
be with warmer climates poorer 0.98
be with climates typically poorer 0.97
be with climates poorer 0.95
be with warmer climates 0.93
have warmer climates 0.93
be with climates 0.86
have climates 0.85
have more consistent climate than regions at middle latitudes 0.84
have different climate 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(region, be with warmer climates typically poorer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(region, be with warmer climates typically poorer)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(region, be with warmer climates typically poorer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(region, have warmer climates)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(region, be with warmer climates typically poorer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(region, have more consistent climate than regions at middle latitudes)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(region, be with warmer climates typically poorer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(region, have more consistent climate than regions at middle latitudes)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(region, be with warmer climates typically poorer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(region, have different climate)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(region, be with warmer climates typically poorer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(region, have warmer climates)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(region, be with warmer climates typically poorer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(region, have more consistent climate than regions at middle latitudes)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(region, be with warmer climates typically poorer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(region, have different climate)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(region, be with warmer climates typically poorer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(region, have more consistent climate than regions at middle latitudes)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(region, be with warmer climates typically poorer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(region, have different climate)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(region, be with warmer climates typically poorer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(region, have different climate)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(region, be with warmer climates typically poorer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(region, have warmer climates)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(region, be with warmer climates typically poorer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(region, have warmer climates)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(region, be with warmer climates typically poorer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(region, be with warmer climates typically poorer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(region, be with warmer climates typically poorer)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(region, be with warmer climates typically poorer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(region, be with warmer climates typically poorer)